From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:28:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801021428.25164.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102131529.GA32160@elte.hu>
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> (David Brownell Cc:-ed too)
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > Well, we have the following test script in the userland suspend
> > package that is supposed to work right now:
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> > date
> > cd /sys/class/rtc/rtc0
> > echo $(( $(cat since_epoch) + 20 )) > wakealarm
> > s2ram
> > date
> >
> > provided that the new rtc driver code is compiled (and the old one is not).
>
> ok, will try that. A stupid question. The old RTC driver is in
> drivers/char/rtc.c, and maps to:
>
> crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 135 Oct 25 18:02 /dev/rtc
>
> the new driver is in drivers/rtc/*, and maps to:
>
> crw-r--r-- 1 root root 254, 0 Dec 12 02:30 /dev/rtc0
>
> but all the x86 distro boxes i have access to make use of /dev/rtc.
> There's no symlink set up from /dev/rtc to /dev/rtc0 either. So it
> appears to me that the new RTC driver isnt actually utilized on most
> distributions.
I think so.
> shouldnt we provide a Kconfig way of replacing dev 10:135 with the new
> driver's 254:0 device? (while keeping all the current modes of operation
> as well, of course.) It's all supposed to be 100% ioctl ABI compatible
> with the old driver, right? That way distros could start migrating to it
> as well, without depending on any udev hackery.
Question for Dave. ;-)
> > > That way any suspend breakage would be detectable (and bisectable)
> > > in automated testing - if the resume does not come back after 10-20
> > > seconds then the test failed.
> >
> > Yes, but please note that some systems require user space
> > manipulations of the graphics adapter for suspend to work and to
> > detect a breakage of such a system you need to boot it into X and use
> > s2ram to suspend.
>
> yeah, i wouldnt expect graphics mode to come back without quirks. But it
> should still work fine over the network, right? (which is my main mode
> of testing anyway)
Well, if the graphics is sufficiently broken, it won't resume at all.
The "echo core > /sys/power/pm_test && echo mem > /sys/power/state" thing
should always work, though (IOW, if this doesn't work, we cartainly have a
bug).
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 14:55 ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:56 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 3:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 4:29 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801021428.25164.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox