From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:01:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102160137.GA21046@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ae72650801020655h6ec31ce8n5cd9014c00c9f6ad@mail.gmail.com>
* Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> > shouldnt we provide a Kconfig way of replacing dev 10:135 with the
> > new driver's 254:0 device? (while keeping all the current modes of
> > operation as well, of course.) It's all supposed to be 100% ioctl
> > ABI compatible with the old driver, right?
>
> It's not compatible enough to "fake" only the old major/minor. Userspace
> must be fixed not to depend on stuff like: /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/4/183
i think that should be fixed by providing a compatible
/proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq implementation in the new driver too.
> > That way distros could start migrating to it
> > as well, without depending on any udev hackery.
>
> It's in the default udev setup:
> KERNEL=="rtc|rtc0", MODE="0644"
> KERNEL=="rtc0", SYMLINK+="rtc"
but if it breaks max-user-freq (which is needed by qemu for example)
then distros would likely disable it, right?
or this rule might be broken in some way. For example my Fedora 8 box
has this in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:
# miscellaneous
KERNEL=="fuse", MODE="0666"
KERNEL=="rtc|rtc0", MODE="0644"
KERNEL=="rtc0", SYMLINK+="rtc"
still i've got:
crw------- 1 root root 10, 135 Dec 28 08:13 /dev/rtc
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 254, 0 Dec 28 08:13 /dev/rtc0
_and_ my distro kernel doesnt even have CONFIG_RTC enabled - i run the
Fedora 9 devel/rawhide kernel on this box:
# CONFIG_RTC is not set
# CONFIG_GEN_RTC is not set
# CONFIG_HPET_RTC_IRQ is not set
CONFIG_RTC_LIB=y
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
# CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DEBUG is not set
# RTC interfaces
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y
# CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST is not set
udev-116-3.fc8. Maybe i just misunderstood what the grand plan was here
- i assumed it was to smoothly convert from old driver to new driver,
without forcing any changes on user-space.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 14:55 ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:56 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 3:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 4:29 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080102160137.GA21046@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox