public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	"K. Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, ego@in.ibm.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Markers Implementation for Preempt RCU Boost Tracing
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:56:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102175606.GD11496@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102170157.GA11161@elte.hu>

Hi -

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:01:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [...]
> well, -freorder-blocks seems to be default-enabled at -O2 on gcc 4.2, so 
> we should already be getting that, right?

Right.

> [...]  So it would be nice if we could collect all this offline code
> and stuff it away into another portion of the kernel image. (or,
> into another portion of the object file - which would still be good
> enough in practice)

That would be the -freorder-blocks-and-partition flag, as proposed by
Arjan two Februarys ago.  I don't see any traces of Andi's overriding
"-fno-reorder-blocks" in the current linus tree, so maybe it's time to
resurrect this one:

http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/39/196123.html

- FChE

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-02 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-31  6:09 [PATCH 2/2] Markers Implementation for Preempt RCU Boost Tracing K. Prasad
2007-12-31 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02  3:31   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-01-02 12:47     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 16:33       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-01-02 17:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:56           ` Frank Ch. Eigler [this message]
2008-01-02 20:10             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-07 18:59           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-13 18:07             ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-14 15:35               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-14 16:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-14 19:36                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-02 23:49         ` Nicholas Miell
2008-01-03 19:24   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-03 16:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-04 10:58   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-01-05 12:46     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-07 19:43       ` K. Prasad
2008-01-07 19:50       ` [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II K. Prasad
2008-02-18 12:21         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-18 12:47         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-18 19:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-18 20:41             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-19 16:27             ` Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II) Jan Kiszka
2008-02-19 20:33               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-19 22:18                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-19 22:32                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-19 21:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-19 22:03                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-19 22:19                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-01-07 19:55       ` [PATCH 1/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Preempt Tracing - Ver II K. Prasad
2008-01-07 19:56       ` [PATCH 2/2] Markers Implementation for Preempt RCU Boost " K. Prasad
2008-01-04 12:09   ` __get_cpu_var() called from a preempt-unsafe context in __rcu_preempt_unboost() ? Gautham R Shenoy
2008-01-04 13:48     ` Steven Rostedt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-29 18:46 [PATCH 2/2] Markers Implementation for Preempt RCU Boost Tracing K. Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080102175606.GD11496@redhat.com \
    --to=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox