public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:16:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102211655.GC15898@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102192629.28e67241.diegocg@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:26:29PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> escribió:
> 
> > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, 
> > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel 
> > offered it - and that's definitely not intended.
> 
> But isn't that the whole purpose of having ext4 snapshots in the stable kernel - to
> allow people to try it?

ext4 has quite an unusual development model for kernel code, other 
code in the state of ext4 is usually only in -mm and not in stable 
kernels.

Stable kernels are mainly meant for usage, not for trying stuff.
And although I see a point in perhaps shipping some not-yet-perfect 
device drivers for otherwise unsupported hardware or some
not-yet-perfect filesystems required for accessing foreign
(non-Linux) filesystems, I don't see any point in offering a
WIP Linux-only filesystem in stable kernels.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-02 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-02  1:32 [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2008-01-02 17:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-02 19:51   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-02 21:51     ` Eric Anopolsky
2008-01-04  5:41       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-02 22:43     ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-02 20:40   ` Alan Cox
2008-01-02 18:26 ` Diego Calleja
2008-01-02 21:16   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-02 21:21     ` Alan Cox
2008-01-02 21:31     ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080102211655.GC15898@does.not.exist \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox