From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:16:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102211655.GC15898@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102192629.28e67241.diegocg@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:26:29PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> escribió:
>
> > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels,
> > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel
> > offered it - and that's definitely not intended.
>
> But isn't that the whole purpose of having ext4 snapshots in the stable kernel - to
> allow people to try it?
ext4 has quite an unusual development model for kernel code, other
code in the state of ext4 is usually only in -mm and not in stable
kernels.
Stable kernels are mainly meant for usage, not for trying stuff.
And although I see a point in perhaps shipping some not-yet-perfect
device drivers for otherwise unsupported hardware or some
not-yet-perfect filesystems required for accessing foreign
(non-Linux) filesystems, I don't see any point in offering a
WIP Linux-only filesystem in stable kernels.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-02 1:32 [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2008-01-02 17:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-02 19:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-02 21:51 ` Eric Anopolsky
2008-01-04 5:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-02 22:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-02 20:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-02 18:26 ` Diego Calleja
2008-01-02 21:16 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-02 21:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-02 21:31 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080102211655.GC15898@does.not.exist \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox