public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
@ 2008-01-03 11:19 Cyrill Gorcunov
  2008-01-03 11:29 ` Jörn Engel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-01-03 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: LKML, David Woodhouse

This patch eliminates code-style errors according
to checkpatch.pl

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
---

Ingo, David, md5sums will be different for old and patched
asm listings due to:

	- zero initialized static vars take off
	- assignments moved out from 'if' conditions
	- EXPORT_SYMBOL's set at appropriate places

anyway the changes are trivial, so even a glance review
would be enough to ensure that it doesn't bring errors
into the kernel

before:
	total: 20 errors, 17 warnings, 1473 lines checked
after:
	total: 2 errors, 12 warnings, 1480 lines checked

Any comments are welcome.

 kernel/audit.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index f93c271..4e71602 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int	audit_rate_limit;
 /* Number of outstanding audit_buffers allowed. */
 static int	audit_backlog_limit = 64;
 static int	audit_backlog_wait_time = 60 * HZ;
-static int	audit_backlog_wait_overflow = 0;
+static int	audit_backlog_wait_overflow;
 
 /* The identity of the user shutting down the audit system. */
 uid_t		audit_sig_uid = -1;
@@ -158,8 +158,7 @@ static void audit_set_pid(struct audit_buffer *ab, pid_t pid)
 
 void audit_panic(const char *message)
 {
-	switch (audit_failure)
-	{
+	switch (audit_failure) {
 	case AUDIT_FAIL_SILENT:
 		break;
 	case AUDIT_FAIL_PRINTK:
@@ -173,15 +172,16 @@ void audit_panic(const char *message)
 
 static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
 {
-	static unsigned long	last_check = 0;
-	static int		messages   = 0;
+	static unsigned long	last_check;
+	static int		messages;
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		now;
 	unsigned long		elapsed;
 	int			retval	   = 0;
 
-	if (!audit_rate_limit) return 1;
+	if (!audit_rate_limit)
+		return 1;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);
 	if (++messages < audit_rate_limit) {
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
 */
 void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
 {
-	static unsigned long	last_msg = 0;
+	static unsigned long	last_msg;
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		now;
@@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
 
 	if (print) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING
-		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
+		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
+		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
 		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
 		       audit_rate_limit,
 		       audit_backlog_limit);
@@ -253,7 +254,8 @@ static int audit_set_rate_limit(int limit, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_rate_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -288,7 +290,8 @@ static int audit_set_backlog_limit(int limit, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_backlog_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -326,7 +329,8 @@ static int audit_set_enabled(int state, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_enabled=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -366,7 +370,8 @@ static int audit_set_failure(int state, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_failure=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -626,18 +631,20 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_ENABLED) {
 			err = audit_set_enabled(status_get->enabled,
 							loginuid, sid);
-			if (err < 0) return err;
+			if (err < 0)
+				return err;
 		}
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_FAILURE) {
 			err = audit_set_failure(status_get->failure,
 							 loginuid, sid);
-			if (err < 0) return err;
+			if (err < 0)
+				return err;
 		}
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) {
 			int old   = audit_pid;
 			if (sid) {
-				if ((err = selinux_sid_to_string(
-						sid, &ctx, &len)))
+				err = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+				if (err)
 					return err;
 				else
 					audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
@@ -925,9 +932,10 @@ static void audit_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		rlen = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len);
 		if (rlen > skb->len)
 			rlen = skb->len;
-		if ((err = audit_receive_msg(skb, nlh))) {
+		err = audit_receive_msg(skb, nlh);
+		if (err)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, err);
-		} else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK)
+		else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, 0);
 		skb_pull(skb, rlen);
 	}
@@ -1019,8 +1027,8 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&audit_freelist_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static struct audit_buffer * audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
-						gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
+static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
+					       gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct audit_buffer *ab = NULL;
@@ -1078,7 +1086,7 @@ err:
 unsigned int audit_serial(void)
 {
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(serial_lock);
-	static unsigned int serial = 0;
+	static unsigned int serial;
 
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int ret;
@@ -1188,6 +1196,7 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			 t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec/1000000, serial);
 	return ab;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
 
 /**
  * audit_expand - expand skb in the audit buffer
@@ -1269,6 +1278,7 @@ void audit_log_format(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt, ...)
 	audit_log_vformat(ab, fmt, args);
 	va_end(args);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
 
 /**
  * audit_log_hex - convert a buffer to hex and append it to the audit skb
@@ -1295,19 +1305,19 @@ void audit_log_hex(struct audit_buffer *ab, const unsigned char *buf,
 	BUG_ON(!ab->skb);
 	skb = ab->skb;
 	avail = skb_tailroom(skb);
-	new_len = len<<1;
+	new_len = len << 1;
 	if (new_len >= avail) {
 		/* Round the buffer request up to the next multiple */
-		new_len = AUDIT_BUFSIZ*(((new_len-avail)/AUDIT_BUFSIZ) + 1);
+		new_len = AUDIT_BUFSIZ * (((new_len - avail) / AUDIT_BUFSIZ) + 1);
 		avail = audit_expand(ab, new_len);
 		if (!avail)
 			return;
 	}
 
 	ptr = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
-	for (i=0; i<len; i++) {
-		*ptr++ = hex[(buf[i] & 0xF0)>>4]; /* Upper nibble */
-		*ptr++ = hex[buf[i] & 0x0F];	  /* Lower nibble */
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+		*ptr++ = hex[(buf[i] & 0xF0) >> 4];	/* Upper nibble */
+		*ptr++ = hex[buf[i] & 0x0F];		/* Lower nibble */
 	}
 	*ptr = 0;
 	skb_put(skb, len << 1); /* new string is twice the old string */
@@ -1402,7 +1412,7 @@ void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *prefix,
 		audit_log_format(ab, "<no memory>");
 		return;
 	}
-	p = d_path(dentry, vfsmnt, path, PATH_MAX+11);
+	p = d_path(dentry, vfsmnt, path, PATH_MAX + 11);
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) { /* Should never happen since we send PATH_MAX */
 		/* FIXME: can we save some information here? */
 		audit_log_format(ab, "<too long>");
@@ -1439,6 +1449,7 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	}
 	audit_buffer_free(ab);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
 
 /**
  * audit_log - Log an audit record
@@ -1466,8 +1477,4 @@ void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
 		audit_log_end(ab);
 	}
 }
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 11:19 [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2008-01-03 11:29 ` Jörn Engel
  2008-01-03 11:46   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  2008-01-03 14:05   ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jörn Engel @ 2008-01-03 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyrill Gorcunov; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, LKML, David Woodhouse

On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>  
>  	if (print) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
> -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
> +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
>  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
>  		       audit_rate_limit,
>  		       audit_backlog_limit);

This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to
assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping
for printk output to find the code generating the message.

Rest looks good to me.

Jörn

-- 
He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
-- B. Franklin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 11:29 ` Jörn Engel
@ 2008-01-03 11:46   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  2008-01-03 12:10     ` Tomas Carnecky
  2008-01-03 14:05   ` Ingo Molnar
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-01-03 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_, ?=; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, LKML, David Woodhouse

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
| On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
| >  
| >  	if (print) {
| >  		printk(KERN_WARNING
| > -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
| > +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
| > +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
| >  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
| >  		       audit_rate_limit,
| >  		       audit_backlog_limit);
| 
| This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to
| assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping
| for printk output to find the code generating the message.
| 
| Rest looks good to me.
| 
| Jörn
| 
| -- 
| He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
| -- B. Franklin
| 

indeed.

here is updated one (with these part removed)

---

 kernel/audit.c |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index f93c271..22b951e 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int	audit_rate_limit;
 /* Number of outstanding audit_buffers allowed. */
 static int	audit_backlog_limit = 64;
 static int	audit_backlog_wait_time = 60 * HZ;
-static int	audit_backlog_wait_overflow = 0;
+static int	audit_backlog_wait_overflow;
 
 /* The identity of the user shutting down the audit system. */
 uid_t		audit_sig_uid = -1;
@@ -158,8 +158,7 @@ static void audit_set_pid(struct audit_buffer *ab, pid_t pid)
 
 void audit_panic(const char *message)
 {
-	switch (audit_failure)
-	{
+	switch (audit_failure) {
 	case AUDIT_FAIL_SILENT:
 		break;
 	case AUDIT_FAIL_PRINTK:
@@ -173,15 +172,16 @@ void audit_panic(const char *message)
 
 static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
 {
-	static unsigned long	last_check = 0;
-	static int		messages   = 0;
+	static unsigned long	last_check;
+	static int		messages;
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		now;
 	unsigned long		elapsed;
 	int			retval	   = 0;
 
-	if (!audit_rate_limit) return 1;
+	if (!audit_rate_limit)
+		return 1;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);
 	if (++messages < audit_rate_limit) {
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
 */
 void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
 {
-	static unsigned long	last_msg = 0;
+	static unsigned long	last_msg;
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		now;
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int audit_set_rate_limit(int limit, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_rate_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -288,7 +289,8 @@ static int audit_set_backlog_limit(int limit, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_backlog_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -326,7 +328,8 @@ static int audit_set_enabled(int state, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_enabled=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -366,7 +369,8 @@ static int audit_set_failure(int state, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc == 0) {
 			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 				"audit_failure=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
 				" subj=%s res=%d",
@@ -626,18 +630,20 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_ENABLED) {
 			err = audit_set_enabled(status_get->enabled,
 							loginuid, sid);
-			if (err < 0) return err;
+			if (err < 0)
+				return err;
 		}
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_FAILURE) {
 			err = audit_set_failure(status_get->failure,
 							 loginuid, sid);
-			if (err < 0) return err;
+			if (err < 0)
+				return err;
 		}
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) {
 			int old   = audit_pid;
 			if (sid) {
-				if ((err = selinux_sid_to_string(
-						sid, &ctx, &len)))
+				err = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+				if (err)
 					return err;
 				else
 					audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
@@ -925,9 +931,10 @@ static void audit_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		rlen = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len);
 		if (rlen > skb->len)
 			rlen = skb->len;
-		if ((err = audit_receive_msg(skb, nlh))) {
+		err = audit_receive_msg(skb, nlh);
+		if (err)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, err);
-		} else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK)
+		else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, 0);
 		skb_pull(skb, rlen);
 	}
@@ -1019,8 +1026,8 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&audit_freelist_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static struct audit_buffer * audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
-						gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
+static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
+					       gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct audit_buffer *ab = NULL;
@@ -1078,7 +1085,7 @@ err:
 unsigned int audit_serial(void)
 {
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(serial_lock);
-	static unsigned int serial = 0;
+	static unsigned int serial;
 
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int ret;
@@ -1188,6 +1195,7 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			 t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec/1000000, serial);
 	return ab;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
 
 /**
  * audit_expand - expand skb in the audit buffer
@@ -1269,6 +1277,7 @@ void audit_log_format(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt, ...)
 	audit_log_vformat(ab, fmt, args);
 	va_end(args);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
 
 /**
  * audit_log_hex - convert a buffer to hex and append it to the audit skb
@@ -1295,19 +1304,19 @@ void audit_log_hex(struct audit_buffer *ab, const unsigned char *buf,
 	BUG_ON(!ab->skb);
 	skb = ab->skb;
 	avail = skb_tailroom(skb);
-	new_len = len<<1;
+	new_len = len << 1;
 	if (new_len >= avail) {
 		/* Round the buffer request up to the next multiple */
-		new_len = AUDIT_BUFSIZ*(((new_len-avail)/AUDIT_BUFSIZ) + 1);
+		new_len = AUDIT_BUFSIZ * (((new_len - avail) / AUDIT_BUFSIZ) + 1);
 		avail = audit_expand(ab, new_len);
 		if (!avail)
 			return;
 	}
 
 	ptr = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
-	for (i=0; i<len; i++) {
-		*ptr++ = hex[(buf[i] & 0xF0)>>4]; /* Upper nibble */
-		*ptr++ = hex[buf[i] & 0x0F];	  /* Lower nibble */
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+		*ptr++ = hex[(buf[i] & 0xF0) >> 4];	/* Upper nibble */
+		*ptr++ = hex[buf[i] & 0x0F];		/* Lower nibble */
 	}
 	*ptr = 0;
 	skb_put(skb, len << 1); /* new string is twice the old string */
@@ -1402,7 +1411,7 @@ void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *prefix,
 		audit_log_format(ab, "<no memory>");
 		return;
 	}
-	p = d_path(dentry, vfsmnt, path, PATH_MAX+11);
+	p = d_path(dentry, vfsmnt, path, PATH_MAX + 11);
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) { /* Should never happen since we send PATH_MAX */
 		/* FIXME: can we save some information here? */
 		audit_log_format(ab, "<too long>");
@@ -1439,6 +1448,7 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	}
 	audit_buffer_free(ab);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
 
 /**
  * audit_log - Log an audit record
@@ -1466,8 +1476,4 @@ void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
 		audit_log_end(ab);
 	}
 }
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 11:46   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2008-01-03 12:10     ` Tomas Carnecky
  2008-01-03 12:16       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Carnecky @ 2008-01-03 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyrill Gorcunov
  Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_, ?=, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
	David Woodhouse

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
> | On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> | > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
> | >  
> | >  	if (print) {
> | >  		printk(KERN_WARNING
> | > -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> | > +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
> | > +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> | >  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
> | >  		       audit_rate_limit,
> | >  		       audit_backlog_limit);
> | 
> | This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to
> | assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping
> | for printk output to find the code generating the message.
> | 
> | Rest looks good to me.
> | 
> | Jörn
> | 
> | -- 
> | He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
> | -- B. Franklin
> | 
> 
> indeed.
> 
> here is updated one (with these part removed)

Instead of removing that part completely, why not print this:
"audit: lost=%d rate_limit=%d backlog_limit=%d\n"

In that line there were too many 'audit's IMHO, and if someone wants to 
grep 'audit_lost=' he still can, 'audit:.*lost=' or something like that..

tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 12:10     ` Tomas Carnecky
@ 2008-01-03 12:16       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-01-03 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomas Carnecky; +Cc: joern, Ingo_Molnar, LKML, David_Woodhouse

[Tomas Carnecky - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:10:28PM +0100]
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> [=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel_ - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:29:57PM +0100]
>> | On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> | > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>> | >  | >  	if (print) {
>> | >  		printk(KERN_WARNING
>> | > -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d 
>> audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
>> | > +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
>> | > +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
>> | >  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
>> | >  		       audit_rate_limit,
>> | >  		       audit_backlog_limit);
>> | | This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to
>> | assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping
>> | for printk output to find the code generating the message.
>> | | Rest looks good to me.
>> | | Jörn
>> | | -- | He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
>> | -- B. Franklin
>> | indeed.
>> here is updated one (with these part removed)
>
> Instead of removing that part completely, why not print this:
> "audit: lost=%d rate_limit=%d backlog_limit=%d\n"
>
> In that line there were too many 'audit's IMHO, and if someone wants to 
> grep 'audit_lost=' he still can, 'audit:.*lost=' or something like that..
>
> tom
>

Well, it seems David is a mainteiner of this code,
so if he would not argue against this the we could.

		- Cyrill -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 11:29 ` Jörn Engel
  2008-01-03 11:46   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2008-01-03 14:05   ` Ingo Molnar
  2008-01-03 14:29     ` David Woodhouse
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-01-03 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jörn Engel; +Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov, LKML, David Woodhouse


* Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org> wrote:

> > -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> > +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
> > +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> >  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
> >  		       audit_rate_limit,
> >  		       audit_backlog_limit);
> 
> This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to 
> assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping 
> for printk output to find the code generating the message.

not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you 
tried to grep this way:

  grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c

?

That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People 
usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a 
line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 14:05   ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-01-03 14:29     ` David Woodhouse
  2008-01-03 14:37       ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2008-01-03 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Jörn Engel, Cyrill Gorcunov, LKML


On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you 
> tried to grep this way:
> 
>   grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c

Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people
have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit".

Leave it as it was.

Also, please don't add 'if (rc == 0)'. Use 'if (rc)' instead.

-- 
dwmw2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 14:29     ` David Woodhouse
@ 2008-01-03 14:37       ` Ingo Molnar
  2008-01-03 14:37         ` David Woodhouse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-01-03 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Jörn Engel, Cyrill Gorcunov, LKML


* David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you 
> > tried to grep this way:
> > 
> >   grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
> 
> Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people 
> have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit".

yes - but if you read my whole reply you'll see that i qualified it:

>> That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People 
>> usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a 
>>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 14:37       ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-01-03 14:37         ` David Woodhouse
  2008-01-03 14:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2008-01-03 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Jörn Engel, Cyrill Gorcunov, LKML


On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you 
> > > tried to grep this way:
> > > 
> > >   grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
> > 
> > Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people 
> > have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit".
> 
> yes - but if you read my whole reply you'll see that i qualified it:
> 
> >> That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People 
> >> usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a 
> >>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.

Yes, you did. But you failed to provide any good reason for actually
changing it, either. Leave it as it was.

-- 
dwmw2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 14:37         ` David Woodhouse
@ 2008-01-03 14:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  2008-01-03 14:57             ` David Woodhouse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-01-03 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Jörn Engel, LKML, Ingo Molnar

[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +0000]
| 
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > * David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
| > 
| > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > > > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you 
| > > > tried to grep this way:
| > > > 
| > > >   grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
| > > 
| > > Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people 
| > > have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit".
| > 
| > yes - but if you read my whole reply you'll see that i qualified it:
| > 
| > >> That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People 
| > >> usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a 
| > >>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| > >> line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.
| 
| Yes, you did. But you failed to provide any good reason for actually
| changing it, either. Leave it as it was.
| 
| -- 
| dwmw2
| 

so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
splitted line, should I?

		- Cyrill -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 14:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2008-01-03 14:57             ` David Woodhouse
  2008-01-03 16:31               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2008-01-03 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyrill Gorcunov; +Cc: Jörn Engel, LKML, Ingo Molnar


On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:50 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> 
> 
> so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
> splitted line, should I?

And with the if (rc == 0) thing fixed too. Yes please.

-- 
dwmw2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
  2008-01-03 14:57             ` David Woodhouse
@ 2008-01-03 16:31               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-01-03 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Jörn Engel, LKML

[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:57:08PM +0000]
| 
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:50 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > 
| > 
| > so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
| > splitted line, should I?
| 
| And with the if (rc == 0) thing fixed too. Yes please.
| 
| -- 
| dwmw2
| 

here is an updated patch

---
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl

This patch eliminates most of errors pointed by checkpatch.pl
over kernel/audit.c file.

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
---

David, to use 'if (rc)' form instead of 'if (rc == 0)' i had
to move 'kfree(ctx)' out of if-else condition but that is OK
'case a lot of further audit.c code was doing the same ;)

 kernel/audit.c |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index f93c271..2961ee4 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int	audit_rate_limit;
 /* Number of outstanding audit_buffers allowed. */
 static int	audit_backlog_limit = 64;
 static int	audit_backlog_wait_time = 60 * HZ;
-static int	audit_backlog_wait_overflow = 0;
+static int	audit_backlog_wait_overflow;
 
 /* The identity of the user shutting down the audit system. */
 uid_t		audit_sig_uid = -1;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(audit_cmd_mutex);
 
 /* AUDIT_MAXFREE is the number of empty audit_buffers we keep on the
  * audit_freelist.  Doing so eliminates many kmalloc/kfree calls. */
-#define AUDIT_MAXFREE  (2*NR_CPUS)
+#define AUDIT_MAXFREE (2 * NR_CPUS)
 
 /* The audit_buffer is used when formatting an audit record.  The caller
  * locks briefly to get the record off the freelist or to allocate the
@@ -158,8 +158,7 @@ static void audit_set_pid(struct audit_buffer *ab, pid_t pid)
 
 void audit_panic(const char *message)
 {
-	switch (audit_failure)
-	{
+	switch (audit_failure) {
 	case AUDIT_FAIL_SILENT:
 		break;
 	case AUDIT_FAIL_PRINTK:
@@ -173,15 +172,16 @@ void audit_panic(const char *message)
 
 static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
 {
-	static unsigned long	last_check = 0;
-	static int		messages   = 0;
+	static unsigned long	last_check;
+	static int		messages;
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		now;
 	unsigned long		elapsed;
 	int			retval	   = 0;
 
-	if (!audit_rate_limit) return 1;
+	if (!audit_rate_limit)
+		return 1;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);
 	if (++messages < audit_rate_limit) {
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
 */
 void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
 {
-	static unsigned long	last_msg = 0;
+	static unsigned long	last_msg;
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		now;
@@ -253,14 +253,15 @@ static int audit_set_rate_limit(int limit, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
-			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
-				"audit_rate_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
-				" subj=%s res=%d",
-				limit, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
-			kfree(ctx);
-		} else
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc)
 			res = 0; /* Something weird, deny request */
+		else
+			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
+				  "audit_rate_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
+				  " subj=%s res=%d",
+				  limit, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
+		kfree(ctx);
 	}
 	audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 		"audit_rate_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u res=%d",
@@ -288,14 +289,15 @@ static int audit_set_backlog_limit(int limit, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
-			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
-				"audit_backlog_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
-				" subj=%s res=%d",
-				limit, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
-			kfree(ctx);
-		} else
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc)
 			res = 0; /* Something weird, deny request */
+		else
+			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
+				  "audit_backlog_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
+				  " subj=%s res=%d",
+				  limit, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
+		kfree(ctx);
 	}
 	audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 		"audit_backlog_limit=%d old=%d by auid=%u res=%d",
@@ -326,14 +328,15 @@ static int audit_set_enabled(int state, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
-			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
-				"audit_enabled=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
-				" subj=%s res=%d",
-				state, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
-			kfree(ctx);
-		} else
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc)
 			res = 0; /* Something weird, deny request */
+		else
+			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
+				  "audit_enabled=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
+				  " subj=%s res=%d",
+				  state, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
+		kfree(ctx);
 	}
 	audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 		"audit_enabled=%d old=%d by auid=%u res=%d",
@@ -366,14 +369,15 @@ static int audit_set_failure(int state, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
 	if (sid) {
 		char *ctx = NULL;
 		u32 len;
-		if ((rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len)) == 0) {
-			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
-				"audit_failure=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
-				" subj=%s res=%d",
-				state, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
-			kfree(ctx);
-		} else
+		rc = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+		if (rc)
 			res = 0; /* Something weird, deny request */
+		else
+			audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
+				  "audit_failure=%d old=%d by auid=%u"
+				  " subj=%s res=%d",
+				  state, old, loginuid, ctx, res);
+		kfree(ctx);
 	}
 	audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
 		"audit_failure=%d old=%d by auid=%u res=%d",
@@ -626,18 +630,20 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_ENABLED) {
 			err = audit_set_enabled(status_get->enabled,
 							loginuid, sid);
-			if (err < 0) return err;
+			if (err < 0)
+				return err;
 		}
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_FAILURE) {
 			err = audit_set_failure(status_get->failure,
 							 loginuid, sid);
-			if (err < 0) return err;
+			if (err < 0)
+				return err;
 		}
 		if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) {
 			int old   = audit_pid;
 			if (sid) {
-				if ((err = selinux_sid_to_string(
-						sid, &ctx, &len)))
+				err = selinux_sid_to_string(sid, &ctx, &len);
+				if (err)
 					return err;
 				else
 					audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
@@ -791,7 +797,8 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
 		audit_log_format(ab, " op=trim res=1");
 		audit_log_end(ab);
 		break;
-	case AUDIT_MAKE_EQUIV: {
+	case AUDIT_MAKE_EQUIV:
+	{
 		void *bufp = data;
 		u32 sizes[2];
 		size_t len = nlmsg_len(nlh);
@@ -925,9 +932,10 @@ static void audit_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		rlen = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len);
 		if (rlen > skb->len)
 			rlen = skb->len;
-		if ((err = audit_receive_msg(skb, nlh))) {
+		err = audit_receive_msg(skb, nlh);
+		if (err)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, err);
-		} else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK)
+		else if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, 0);
 		skb_pull(skb, rlen);
 	}
@@ -996,7 +1004,6 @@ static int __init audit_enable(char *str)
 		audit_enabled = audit_default;
 	return 1;
 }
-
 __setup("audit=", audit_enable);
 
 static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
@@ -1019,8 +1026,8 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&audit_freelist_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static struct audit_buffer * audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
-						gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
+static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
+					       gfp_t gfp_mask, int type)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct audit_buffer *ab = NULL;
@@ -1078,7 +1085,7 @@ err:
 unsigned int audit_serial(void)
 {
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(serial_lock);
-	static unsigned int serial = 0;
+	static unsigned int serial;
 
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int ret;
@@ -1185,9 +1192,10 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &t, &serial);
 
 	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%lu.%03lu:%u): ",
-			 t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec/1000000, serial);
+			 t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec / 1000000, serial);
 	return ab;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
 
 /**
  * audit_expand - expand skb in the audit buffer
@@ -1240,7 +1248,7 @@ static void audit_log_vformat(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt,
 		 * here and AUDIT_BUFSIZ is at least 1024, then we can
 		 * log everything that printk could have logged. */
 		avail = audit_expand(ab,
-			max_t(unsigned, AUDIT_BUFSIZ, 1+len-avail));
+			max_t(unsigned, AUDIT_BUFSIZ, 1 + len - avail));
 		if (!avail)
 			goto out;
 		len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args2);
@@ -1269,6 +1277,7 @@ void audit_log_format(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *fmt, ...)
 	audit_log_vformat(ab, fmt, args);
 	va_end(args);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
 
 /**
  * audit_log_hex - convert a buffer to hex and append it to the audit skb
@@ -1295,19 +1304,19 @@ void audit_log_hex(struct audit_buffer *ab, const unsigned char *buf,
 	BUG_ON(!ab->skb);
 	skb = ab->skb;
 	avail = skb_tailroom(skb);
-	new_len = len<<1;
+	new_len = len << 1;
 	if (new_len >= avail) {
 		/* Round the buffer request up to the next multiple */
-		new_len = AUDIT_BUFSIZ*(((new_len-avail)/AUDIT_BUFSIZ) + 1);
+		new_len = AUDIT_BUFSIZ * (((new_len - avail) / AUDIT_BUFSIZ) + 1);
 		avail = audit_expand(ab, new_len);
 		if (!avail)
 			return;
 	}
 
 	ptr = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
-	for (i=0; i<len; i++) {
-		*ptr++ = hex[(buf[i] & 0xF0)>>4]; /* Upper nibble */
-		*ptr++ = hex[buf[i] & 0x0F];	  /* Lower nibble */
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+		*ptr++ = hex[(buf[i] & 0xF0) >> 4];	/* Upper nibble */
+		*ptr++ = hex[buf[i] & 0x0F];		/* Lower nibble */
 	}
 	*ptr = 0;
 	skb_put(skb, len << 1); /* new string is twice the old string */
@@ -1397,12 +1406,12 @@ void audit_log_d_path(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char *prefix,
 		audit_log_format(ab, " %s", prefix);
 
 	/* We will allow 11 spaces for ' (deleted)' to be appended */
-	path = kmalloc(PATH_MAX+11, ab->gfp_mask);
+	path = kmalloc(PATH_MAX + 11, ab->gfp_mask);
 	if (!path) {
 		audit_log_format(ab, "<no memory>");
 		return;
 	}
-	p = d_path(dentry, vfsmnt, path, PATH_MAX+11);
+	p = d_path(dentry, vfsmnt, path, PATH_MAX + 11);
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) { /* Should never happen since we send PATH_MAX */
 		/* FIXME: can we save some information here? */
 		audit_log_format(ab, "<too long>");
@@ -1439,6 +1448,7 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
 	}
 	audit_buffer_free(ab);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
 
 /**
  * audit_log - Log an audit record
@@ -1466,8 +1476,4 @@ void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
 		audit_log_end(ab);
 	}
 }
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_start);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_end);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_format);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-03 16:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-03 11:19 [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-01-03 11:29 ` Jörn Engel
2008-01-03 11:46   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-01-03 12:10     ` Tomas Carnecky
2008-01-03 12:16       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-01-03 14:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 14:29     ` David Woodhouse
2008-01-03 14:37       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 14:37         ` David Woodhouse
2008-01-03 14:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-01-03 14:57             ` David Woodhouse
2008-01-03 16:31               ` Cyrill Gorcunov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox