From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bunk@kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Build-Failure at __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:56:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080108105609.197a2874@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080107113831.0865cf5e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew, hi Chritoph,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:38:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > > : undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
> >
> > There is also a kernel.org bugzilla for this at
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9669
> > For some reason my adds to this do not show up.
> >
> > In both cases we have a
> >
> > k(z/m)alloc(sizeof(*pointer), ...)
> >
> > that is for some reason failing. I guess what happens is that the function
> > in which this occurs is too complex for gcc 3.2. Thus it stops constant
> > folding the sizeof(*pointer) in the complex inline-if-cascade that SLAB
> > needs to determine the cache and does not eliminate the
> > __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much branch().
Interesting theory... So I tried to split half of the code of
dmi_id_init() to a subfunction and bingo! gcc 3.2.3 is now able to
build it properly. Thanks for the hint!
> > SLUB in that case just puts a series of if comparisions in the code. This
> > means compilation does not fail but a large amount of code is generated.
>
> ug. Silent and nasty.
>
> > We could replace the __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() with a BUG()
> > statement so we have the same effect in SLAB?
>
> I think it'd be better to just put suitable workarounds at the offending
> callsites. We've only seen three or four of them in several months.
Here's a workaround for dmi-id.
Subject: Fix for __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much failure in dmi-id
gcc 3.2 has a hard time coping with the code in dmi_id_init():
drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x789e): In function `dmi_id_init':
: undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
Moving half of the code to a separate function seems to help. This is
a no-op for gcc 4.1 which will successfully inline the code anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
---
drivers/firmware/dmi-id.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/drivers/firmware/dmi-id.c 2007-10-24 09:59:28.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/drivers/firmware/dmi-id.c 2008-01-08 10:32:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -175,12 +175,11 @@ static struct device *dmi_dev;
extern int dmi_available;
-static int __init dmi_id_init(void)
+/* In a separate function to keep gcc 3.2 happy - do NOT merge this in
+ dmi_id_init! */
+static void __init dmi_id_init_attr_table(void)
{
- int ret, i;
-
- if (!dmi_available)
- return -ENODEV;
+ int i;
/* Not necessarily all DMI fields are available on all
* systems, hence let's built an attribute table of just
@@ -205,6 +204,16 @@ static int __init dmi_id_init(void)
ADD_DMI_ATTR(chassis_serial, DMI_CHASSIS_SERIAL);
ADD_DMI_ATTR(chassis_asset_tag, DMI_CHASSIS_ASSET_TAG);
sys_dmi_attributes[i++] = &sys_dmi_modalias_attr.attr;
+}
+
+static int __init dmi_id_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!dmi_available)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ dmi_id_init_attr_table();
ret = class_register(&dmi_class);
if (ret)
I'll now check if I can do something similar for snd-mixer-oss.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-08 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-06 22:19 Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 23:52 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-07 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-07 0:35 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-07 8:48 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Build Failure on headers_install Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-07 10:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-08 10:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-08 13:10 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-07 10:36 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Build-Failure at __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-07 18:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-07 18:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-07 19:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-08 9:56 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-01-08 10:44 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-08 12:34 ` Fix for __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much failure with gcc 3.2 Jean Delvare
2008-01-08 4:20 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Build-Failure at __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-08 5:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 8:20 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-08 9:27 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-08 7:48 ` Jean Delvare
2008-01-07 12:13 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:5156! Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-08 16:16 ` [powerpc crash] " Ingo Molnar
2008-01-07 15:53 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-07 16:27 ` smpboot_64 section mismatch warning Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-07 23:27 ` David Howells
2008-01-08 9:14 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-08 11:17 ` David Howells
2008-01-07 16:31 ` section mismatch warning in head_64.S Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-15 10:18 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-07 16:14 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-07 16:24 ` Michael Buesch
2008-01-07 16:52 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-07 17:30 ` Michael Buesch
2008-01-07 20:23 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-08 15:30 ` Michael Buesch
2008-01-08 15:55 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-01-08 0:50 ` J.A. Magallón
2008-01-09 1:32 ` Avuton Olrich
2008-01-09 1:56 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-10 9:25 ` J.A. Magallón
2008-01-10 13:10 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-13 23:19 ` J.A. Magallón
2008-01-13 23:57 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-14 23:38 ` J.A. Magallón
2008-01-14 23:56 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-08 18:42 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7: sparc64: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show() Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-08 21:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-08 22:39 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-08 22:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-01-09 16:31 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-01-08 22:50 ` David Miller
2008-01-08 22:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:06 ` David Miller
2008-01-09 0:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:17 ` Linux 2.6.24-rc7 Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080108105609.197a2874@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox