Re: [PATCH 4/7] udf: replace loops coded with goto to real loops

[Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:17:32AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 07-01-08 22:10:01, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
> > >   I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
> > > really a loop in nature, then we should code it using do {} while but in
> > > case we loop back just in case of some error (as seems to be the case in
> > > udf_bitmap_new_block()), then IMHO goto is more explanative. So at least
> > > that one case I'd leave as is.
> > Why do you think it's an error?
>   There is code:
> 
>           if (!udf_clear_bit(bit, bh->b_data)) {
>                 udf_debug("bit already cleared for block %d\n", bit);
>                 goto repeat;
>         }
>   Now if this happens, it's a bug AFAICS because we have been searching for
> a free block and we hold s_alloc_mutex and hence we should not race with
> any other allocation.
Fine, I'll drop this part of patch.

Marcin