public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shaggy@us.ibm.com,
	sandeen@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Fix dentry handling on create error, unlink, and inode destroy
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:58:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080108215807.GE10989@localhost.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080107214517.ebf5a5bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:45:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:25:42 -0600 Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> > @@ -120,22 +120,9 @@ ecryptfs_do_create(struct inode *directory_inode,
> >  	rc = ecryptfs_create_underlying_file(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode,
> >  					     ecryptfs_dentry, mode, nd);
> >  	if (rc) {
> > -		struct inode *ecryptfs_inode = ecryptfs_dentry->d_inode;
> > -		struct ecryptfs_inode_info *inode_info =
> > -			ecryptfs_inode_to_private(ecryptfs_inode);
> > -
> > -		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Error creating underlying file; "
> > -		       "rc = [%d]; checking for existing\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> > -		if (inode_info) {
> > -			mutex_lock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > -			if (!inode_info->lower_file) {
> > -				mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > -				printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to set underlying "
> > -				       "file; rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> > -				goto out_lock;
> > -			}
> > -			mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > -		}
> > +		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to create dentry in lower fs; "
> > +		       "rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> > +		goto out_lock;
> >  	}
> >  	rc = ecryptfs_interpose(lower_dentry, ecryptfs_dentry,
> >  				directory_inode->i_sb, 0);
> 
> Will this cause an undesirable log storm if the underlying fs runs
> out of space?

When you're bumping up against the end of your storage space, you will
get a lot more that just this message in your logs. There are printk's
in ecryptfs_write_lower(), ecryptfs_encrypt_page(), ecryptfs_write(),
and ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents() that will get pretty
noisy. Is it worth wrapping those in a higher level of verbosity?

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-08 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-08  5:25 [PATCH] eCryptfs: Fix dentry handling on create error, unlink, and inode destroy Michael Halcrow
2008-01-08  5:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-08 21:58   ` Michael Halcrow [this message]
2008-01-08 22:42     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080108215807.GE10989@localhost.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaggy@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox