From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
ananth@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, mhiramat@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kprobes: Add kprobes smoke tests that run on boot
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:28:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080108232841.GD2117@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199833842.3914.33.camel@dyn9047018096.beaverton.ibm.com>
> I have no problem with that, but if we want to make it buildable as a
> module, the call to get_kprobe() needs to be replaced with some other
> gcc-inline-defeating mechanism, or we need to export get_probe(). I
It's still unclear where noinline does not work (do you have details on that?
It sounds a little dubious) but there are lots of different other ways to prevent gcc
from inlining anything.
e.g. you can use stdarg or computed goto or a variable length local array
> much prefer the former, since get_kprobe() is a kprobes-internal
> function.
>
> Anybody know an architecture-independent way (other than noinline, which
> doesn't always work) of making gcc decide not to inline a function?
Details?
> E.g., does taking (and using) the function's address do it?
No, that just creates another out of line copy.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-08 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 6:33 [PATCH] Kprobes: Add kprobes smoke tests that run on boot Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-01-08 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 21:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-08 22:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 22:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-08 22:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 8:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-08 23:10 ` Jim Keniston
2008-01-08 23:28 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-01-09 20:24 ` Jim Keniston
2008-01-09 21:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 22:33 ` Jim Keniston
2008-01-09 7:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080108232841.GD2117@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox