public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: tom@kavaga.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible 2.6.24-rc7 issue w/respect to pthreads
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:07:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109120722.262b4eff.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39848.76.189.45.79.1199874932.squirrel@webmail.kavaga.com>

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:35:32 -0800 (PST)
tom@kavaga.com wrote:

> To Whom It May Concern,
> 
> After I patched my 2.6.23 kernel to 2.6.24-rc7 this morning, I noticed
> some odd behavior with respect to POSIX threads in a test program I had
> written (originally to test epoll.)
> 
> The behavior is as follows:
> 
> 1.  main() creates a new thread of execution with pthread_create
> 2.  thread_func() immediately calls pthread_detach(), which is supposed to
> ensure that thread resources are cleaned up when the thread terminates.
> 3.  The spawned thread sleeps and then prints a message "got here"
> 4.  The main thread calls pthread_join().  According to the POSIX
> documentation, this should suspend execution until the spawned thread has
> terminated.
> 
> What I'm seeing is that the main thread terminates immediately.  If I
> comment out the call to pthread_detach(), the program runs normally.  If I
> boot with my 2.6.23 kernel, the program runs normally.
> 
> I'm not sure if this is some oversight on my part but similar programs
> operate correctly on my Debian etch installation with 2.6.18 as well as
> with the newer 23 kernel, but not with the patch.
> 
> If you have any questions, don't hesitate to email me; my address is
> provided below.
> 
> See Attached (bug.c)
> 
> Tom R. Dial
> tom@kavaga.com

Hello Tom

Your program is buggy and depends on scheduling policies.

To make it fails on 2.6.23 (or say 2.6.9) too, just add a sleep(1) before pthread_join() call

Once a thread calls pthread_detach(pthread_t this_id), it's not possible anymore to
pthread_join(this_id, &ret) or effect is undefined.

(quoting POSIX : "The results of multiple simultaneous calls to pthread_join() specifying the same target thread are undefined" )


      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-09 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-09 10:35 Possible 2.6.24-rc7 issue w/respect to pthreads tom
2008-01-09 10:51 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2008-01-09 10:53 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-01-09 11:07 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080109120722.262b4eff.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@kavaga.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox