From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:08:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109130811.6ea2cca7@tleilax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080109174506.GB30523@infradead.org>
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:45:06 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:33:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > - struct svc_serv * serv;
> > - int error = 0;
> > + struct svc_serv *serv;
> > + struct svc_rqst *rqstp;
> > + int error = 0;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> > /*
> > * Check whether we're already up and running.
> > */
> > - if (nlmsvc_pid) {
> > + if (nlmsvc_task) {
> > if (proto)
> > error = make_socks(nlmsvc_serv, proto);
>
> While equivalent I think it would be clener to check for nlmsvc_serv
> above as that'swhat we're passing to make_socks. But I think the
> whole of lockd_up could use a little makeover, but that's for later.
>
Probably so. If I respin, I'll plan to fix that too.
> > void
> > lockd_down(void)
> > {
> > mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> > if (nlmsvc_users) {
> > if (--nlmsvc_users)
> > goto out;
> > + } else {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "lockd_down: no users! task=%p\n",
> > + nlmsvc_task);
> > + BUG();
> > }
> > + if (!nlmsvc_task) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "lockd_down: no lockd running.\n");
> > + BUG();
> > }
> > + kthread_stop(nlmsvc_task);
>
> I think all this user/foo checking here should be BUG_ONs as it's
> quite fatal errors.
>
> e.g.
>
> void
> lockd_down(void)
> {
> mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
>
> BUG_ON(!nlmsvc_task);
> BUG_ON(!nlmsvc_users);
>
> if (!--nlmsvc_users)
> kthread_stop(nlmsvc_task);
> mutex_unlock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> }
>
>
> same applies for similar checks in lockd_up aswell.
>
With this patch the lockd_down checks should now be BUGs. I decided
not to do that in lockd_up. If there's an error within the main
lockd loop, it can exit without being requested to do so. If someone
then calls lockd_up then the counts will be off and the check will fire.
It seems like if we're going to make the check in lockd_up be a BUG,
then we should also BUG rather than letting lockd exit prematurely.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 19:33 [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #6) Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: spin svc_rqst initialization to its own function Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: export svc_sock_update_bufs Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] NLM: Have lockd call try_to_freeze Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] NLM: Add reference counting to lockd Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 17:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:36 ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 18:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:59 ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-10 3:29 ` Neil Brown
2008-01-10 11:58 ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 17:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:08 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2008-01-09 17:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:05 ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 18:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-13 13:27 ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-13 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-13 19:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-14 14:24 ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-14 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-15 3:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2008-03-15 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-05 12:02 [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #5) Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: spin svc_rqst initialization to its own function Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: export svc_sock_update_bufs Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] NLM: Have lockd call try_to_freeze Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 6:16 ` Neil Brown
2007-12-13 20:40 [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: Allow svc_pool_map_set_cpumask to work with any task Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: Break up __svc_create_thread and make svc_create_kthread Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] NLM: Have lockd call try_to_freeze Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080109130811.6ea2cca7@tleilax.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox