public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:08:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109130811.6ea2cca7@tleilax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080109174506.GB30523@infradead.org>

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:45:06 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:33:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > -	struct svc_serv *	serv;
> > -	int			error = 0;
> > +	struct svc_serv *serv;
> > +	struct svc_rqst *rqstp;
> > +	int		error = 0;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Check whether we're already up and running.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (nlmsvc_pid) {
> > +	if (nlmsvc_task) {
> >  		if (proto)
> >  			error = make_socks(nlmsvc_serv, proto);
> 
> While equivalent I think it would be clener to check for nlmsvc_serv
> above as that'swhat we're passing to make_socks.  But I think the
> whole of lockd_up could use a little makeover, but that's for later.
> 

Probably so. If I respin, I'll plan to fix that too.

> >  void
> >  lockd_down(void)
> >  {
> >  	mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> >  	if (nlmsvc_users) {
> >  		if (--nlmsvc_users)
> >  			goto out;
> > +	} else {
> > +		printk(KERN_ERR "lockd_down: no users! task=%p\n",
> > +			nlmsvc_task);
> > +		BUG();
> >  	}
> > +	if (!nlmsvc_task) {
> > +		printk(KERN_ERR "lockd_down: no lockd running.\n");
> > +		BUG();
> >  	}
> > +	kthread_stop(nlmsvc_task);
> 
> I think all this user/foo checking here should be BUG_ONs as it's
> quite fatal errors.
> 
> e.g.
> 
> void
> lockd_down(void)
> {
>  	mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> 
> 	BUG_ON(!nlmsvc_task);
> 	BUG_ON(!nlmsvc_users);
> 
> 	if (!--nlmsvc_users)
> 		kthread_stop(nlmsvc_task);
> 	mutex_unlock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> }
> 
> 
> same applies for similar checks in lockd_up aswell.
> 	

With this patch the lockd_down checks should now be BUGs. I decided
not to do that in lockd_up. If there's an error within the main
lockd loop, it can exit without being requested to do so. If someone
then calls lockd_up then the counts will be off and the check will fire.

It seems like if we're going to make the check in lockd_up be a BUG,
then we should also BUG rather than letting lockd exit prematurely.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-09 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-08 19:33 [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #6) Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: spin svc_rqst initialization to its own function Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33   ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: export svc_sock_update_bufs Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33     ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33       ` [PATCH 4/6] NLM: Have lockd call try_to_freeze Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33         ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Jeff Layton
2008-01-08 19:33           ` [PATCH 6/6] NLM: Add reference counting to lockd Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 17:47             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:36               ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 18:48                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:59                   ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-10  3:29             ` Neil Brown
2008-01-10 11:58               ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 17:45           ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:08             ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2008-01-09 17:35       ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 18:05         ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-09 18:14           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-13 13:27         ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-13 18:17           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-13 19:12             ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-14 14:24             ` Jeff Layton
2008-01-14 14:25               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-15  3:44             ` Mike Snitzer
2008-03-15  6:34               ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-05 12:02 [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #5) Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: spin svc_rqst initialization to its own function Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02   ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: export svc_sock_update_bufs Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02     ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02       ` [PATCH 4/6] NLM: Have lockd call try_to_freeze Jeff Layton
2008-01-05 12:02         ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Jeff Layton
2008-01-08  6:16           ` Neil Brown
2007-12-13 20:40 [PATCH 0/6] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: Allow svc_pool_map_set_cpumask to work with any task Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40   ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: Break up __svc_create_thread and make svc_create_kthread Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40     ` [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40       ` [PATCH 4/6] NLM: Have lockd call try_to_freeze Jeff Layton
2007-12-13 20:40         ` [PATCH 5/6] NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080109130811.6ea2cca7@tleilax.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox