From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755306AbYAIQ0t (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:26:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752098AbYAIQ0l (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:26:41 -0500 Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.44]:27043 "EHLO g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691AbYAIQ0k (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:26:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:26:39 -0700 From: Alex Chiang To: Micah Parrish Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Input: tell mousedev to handle remote console virtual mice using absolute coordinates Message-ID: <20080109162639.GA30033@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Chiang , Micah Parrish , Dmitry Torokhov , Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel References: <1198188164.7371.40.camel@strongbad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1198188164.7371.40.camel@strongbad> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dmitry, * Micah Parrish : > Devices like the HP Integrated Remote Console Virtual Mouse, which are > standard equipment on all Proliant and Integrity servers, produce > absolute coordinates instead of relative coordinates. This is done to > synchronize the position of the mouse cursor on the client desktop > with the mouse cursor position on the server. Mousedev is not > designed to pass those absolute events directly to X, but it can > translate them into relative movements. It currently does this for > tablet like devices and touchpads. This patch merely tells it to also > include a device with ABS_X, ABS_Y, and mouse buttons in its list of > devices to process input for. > > This patch enables the mouse pointer to move when using the remote > console. Without this patch, the cursor will not move. We're looking to get this patch accepted into a distro, which is of course easier if it is first accepted upstream. Is there anything we can do to help explain this patch further to enable acceptance? Thanks. /ac