From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758120AbYAJDjx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:39:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754419AbYAJDjr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:39:47 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:58773 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754110AbYAJDjq (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:39:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:39:45 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Matthew Hall Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sata_nv does not function in kernel > 2.6.20.21 Message-ID: <20080110033944.GW16309@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080110024733.GC9461@mhcomputing.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080110024733.GC9461@mhcomputing.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 02:47:33AM +0000, Matthew Hall wrote: > I am using the Supermicro H8DCE motherboard. Some (not all) of the SATA > channels quit working due to some kind of resource conflict when I > upgrade to any kernel above 2.6.20.xx series, in my case I am running > 2.6.20.21 SMP x86_64 presently. Could you provide an 'lspci -v' and a 'cat /proc/iomem' for both kernels please? This doesn't seem to be a scsi problem per se, so I'm adding linux-kernel and linux-ide -- can you drop linux-scsi from any reply please. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."