From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ptrace_stop: remove the wrong ->group_stop_count bookkeeping
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:39:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080110213932.GA3396@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4785F675.3070709@suse.cz>
On 01/10, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>
> I can actually see a bug which may be related:
>
> 1. a process creates a thread (or more threads)
> 2. I attach/detach to that thread with strace several times
> (each time pressing CTRL-C to quit strace)
> 3. the whole thread group (except the traced thread) ends in
> TASK_STOPPED
>
> I looked at what strace was doing to that thread, and it sometimes sends
> SIGSTOP shortly before detaching. This is done when the thread is
> running, i.e. not waiting in ptrace_stop. Then PTRACE_DETACH returns
> - -ESRCH because it requires the tracee to be stopped -- just like all
> PTRACE_* requests except TRACEME and ATTACH. So, strace has no other
> option than to send an explicit SIGSTOP to the thread to stop it and
> discard it afterwards.
>
> Could this be related?
Perhaps yes. But there are so many oddities in this area. I don't know what
really happens with your test-case, but afaics this can happen even without
ptrace_stop() playing with the group stop.
Let's suppose that strace detached all sub-threads except T which is running,
and now strace does ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, T). This fails, so strace does
kill(T, SIGSTOP).
Note that it use kill(), not tkill(). This means another sub-thread can
dequeue this signal and initiate the group stop (remember, it was already
detached and thus it is not traced any longer).
Now strace does wait4(T, __WALL). T notices the group stop in progress,
calls handle_group_stop(), and notifies its parent - strace.
wait4() returns success, strace does ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, T) again. Now
T is TASK_STOPPED, ptrace() changes the state to TASK_TRACED and finally
does ptrace_untrace().
ptrace_untrace() sees TASK_TRACED. But it is possible that the group stop
is not completed yet (some sub-thread didn't pass handle_group_stop()), in
that case we are doing signal_wake_up(T, 1) so it becomes running.
I still think this series makes sense even if not complete.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-10 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-08 18:38 [PATCH 2/3] ptrace_stop: remove the wrong ->group_stop_count bookkeeping Oleg Nesterov
2007-12-09 0:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-09 14:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-01-10 10:41 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-01-10 21:39 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-01-11 8:50 ` Petr Tesarik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080110213932.GA3396@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox