From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:56:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080112005619.GA4665@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080111164904.3ca81602.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:49:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:46:13 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > The first patch in the series introduces such a mechanism. The remaining three
> > > patches modify the MSR, x86-64 MCE and cpuid drivers in accordance with the
> > > above approach.
> >
> > These patches are a preresuisite to
> > gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch and its
> > later fixed-up versions.
> >
> > So what I have now is
> >
> > revert-gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> > pm-introduce-destroy_suspended_device.patch
> > pm-do-not-destroy-create-devices-while-suspended-in-msrc-rev-2.patch
> > pm-do-not-destroy-create-devices-while-suspended-in-mce_64c.patch
> > pm-do-not-destroy-create-devices-while-suspended-in-cpuidc.patch
> > pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3.patch
> > pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> > pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3-checkpatch-fixes-2.patch
> >
> > So what needs to happen in Greg's tree is
> >
> > a) drop the old gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> >
> > b) apply these four patches
> >
> > c) apply the new pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3.patch (and its fixups)
>
> err, no. pm-introduce-destroy_suspended_device.patch demolishes
> pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3.patch
>
> Confused, giving up.
I'm confused too, I have no idea what the proper order of things should
be either. Anyone want to give me a hint?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-12 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 14:55 ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:56 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 3:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 4:29 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080112005619.GA4665@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox