From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@tglx.de, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080112063036.GA32675@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080111212623.518e1527@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> this patch series improves the x86 backtracing code in the following ways:
> 1) Fix a bad bug in x86 (32 bit) FRAME_POINTER backtracing (2.6.24 material)
> 2) Add the capability to mark a backtrace entry as reliable / unreliable
> 3) Change the x86 (32 bit) FRAME_POINTER backtracing to use the normal backtrace but use the frames
> as guidance to the reliability of the backtrace entries
> 4) Patch to capture the EBP register earlier in the backtrace callchain to get a better FRAME_POINTER
> based backtrace
> 5) Split the x86 (64 bit) backtrace code up similar to the 32 bit code by turning a macro into a function
> 6) Enable FRAME_POINTER backtracing on 64 bit similar to the 32 bit patch in number 3
> 7) Add a simple self-test module for backtraces (will move to tests/ later when that gets merged)
> 8) Add the feature to x86 64bit to print a set of bytes prior to the current EIP in the Code: line
> (already present in 32 bit)
thanks, i've applied your new series to x86.git. (Note that i had to
move around some of the changes to make the series bisectable.)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-12 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-12 5:26 [patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:28 ` [patch 1/8] x86: Fix x86 32 bit FRAME_POINTER chasing code Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:29 ` [patch 2/8] x86: Add the capability to print fuzzy backtraces Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:30 ` [patch 3/8] x86: Improve the 32 bit Frame Pointer backtracer to also use the traditional backtrace Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:31 ` [patch 4/8] x86: pull EBP calculation earlier into the backtrace path Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:32 ` [patch 5/8] x86: Turn 64 bit x86 HANDLE_STACK into print_context_stack like 32 bit has Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:32 ` [patch 6/8] x86: Use the stack frames to get exact stack-traces for CONFIG_FRAMEPOINTER on x86-64 Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:33 ` [patch 7/8] x86: Add a simple backtrace test module Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 5:34 ` [patch 8/8] x86: Add the "print code before the trapping instruction" feature to 64 bit Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-12 6:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-12 18:24 ` [patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080112063036.GA32675@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@tglx.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox