From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is deleting (or reading) files not counted as IO-Wait in top?
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:24:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080114062432.GN155259@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102193503.GA31414@citd.de>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:35:03PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Currently i'm deleting about 500.000 files on a XFS-filesystem which
> takes a few minutes, as i had a top open i saw that 'wa' is shown as
> 0.0% (Nothing else running currently) and everything except 'id' is near
> the bottom too. Kernel is 2.6.23.11.
Simply because the only I/O that XFS does during a delete is
to the log and the log does async I/O and hence the process
never blocks in I/O.
Instead, it blocks in a far more complex space reservation that
may or may not be related to I/O wait....
> So, as 'rm -rf' is essentially a IO (or seek, to be more correct)-bound
> task, shouldn't that count as "Waiting for IO"?
rm -rf is not seek bound on XFS - it's generally determined by
the sequential write speed of the block device or how fast your
CPU is....
> The man-page of top says:
> 'Amount of time the CPU has been waiting for I/O to complete.'
Async I/O means that typically your CPU does not get held up
waiting for I/O to complete....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-14 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-02 19:35 Why is deleting (or reading) files not counted as IO-Wait in top? Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-01-03 0:16 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-01-03 8:25 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-01-05 9:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-05 16:58 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-01-14 6:24 ` David Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080114062432.GN155259@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@citd.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox