From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751566AbYANU1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:27:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752777AbYANU1e (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:27:34 -0500 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:48240 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752663AbYANU1e (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:27:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:27:40 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , rjw@sisk.pl, pavel@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] [15/16] Force __cpuinit on for CONFIG_PM without HOTPLUG_CPU Message-ID: <20080114202740.GD9257@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080110150911.GG28740@does.not.exist> <20080114135240.GA15357@elte.hu> <20080114140910.GA8507@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080114145854.GA31695@elte.hu> <20080114150103.GA2700@elte.hu> <20080114182052.GB9847@does.not.exist> <20080114191009.GB2288@elte.hu> <20080114195258.GC9847@does.not.exist> <20080114200126.GB9257@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080114201826.GD9847@does.not.exist> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080114201826.GD9847@does.not.exist> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Can you fix the bug that menuconfig does not let me enable CONFIG_64BIT? > > > > make ARCH=x86_64 allyesconfig > > will set CONFIG_64BIT for you - no? > > Yes. > > But this still leaves the fact that when someone says 'allyesconfig' > it's no longer clear which configuration he has. Assuming you are on an x86 box... make allyesconfig will give you a config for same OS bit-size as you run. make ARCH=i386 allyesconfig gives you a 32 bit config make ARCH=x86_64 allyesconfig gives you a 64 bit config make ARCH=x86 allyesconfig gives you a 32 bit config where you can select 64 bit. It was seen as the best solution when unifying 32 and 64 bit stuff and introducing support for ARCH=x86. No-one has complained until now so most people seems to get it or maybe they are just silent. Sam