From: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
phil.el@wanadoo.fr, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:02:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080115120239.GA14260@movial.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080115104526.GA32067@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:45:26AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> I never got a response on my message, but I have just receieved:
>
> | Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:00 +0100
> | From: Joerg Wagner <wagner@it.neclab.eu>
> | To: ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
> | Subject: 2.6.24-rc7 : oprofile on MPCore broken
> |
> | Hello,
> |
> | just tried to use oprofile on 2.6.24-rc7.
> | It does not detect the right processor
> | (/dev/oprofile/cpu_type contains "timer").
> |
> | As I don't know exactly, how the string
> | "arm/mpcore" from arch/arm/oprofile/op_model_mpcore.c
> | gets feeded into that file, maybe someone else can help ?
>
> So people are hitting the resulting mess created by 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
> Can we please fix this regression one way or another please?
>
> I don't particularly like stuffing the options into some random place
> in the architectures Kconfig file when they should stay along side the
> instrumentation configuration entries.
Below is the patch I already sent on 28 Dec 2007 that stuffs it into
Kconfig.instrumentation.
Technically it shouldn't make any difference whether this patch or
Mathieu's patch that stuffs it into arch/arm/Kconfig gets applied, but
one of them should be applied for 2.6.24 (plus either mine or Mathieu's
fix for the blackfin HARDWARE_PM support broken by the same commit).
I found the bugs in Mathieu's commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9,
I wrote patches that restore the status quo, Cc'ed all people even
remotely related to this issue, and I opened the Bugzilla bugs required
for getting them on the regression lists. Mathieu wants the regressions
he introduced fixed different from what my patches did and that's not a
problem for me (his patches are also OK).
What went wrong that his regression fixes did not land in Linus' tree?
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
This patch restores the ARMv6 OProfile support that was killed by
commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
---
kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
7fc221ef169610b5eac98e2ddd641811c0d53e4a
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
index 468f47a..4453187 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
@@ -29,2 +29,17 @@ config OPROFILE
+config OPROFILE_ARMV6
+ bool
+ depends on OPROFILE && ARM && CPU_V6 && !SMP
+ default y
+ select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_MPCORE
+ bool
+ depends on OPROFILE && ARM && CPU_V6 && SMP
+ default y
+ select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+ bool
+
config KPROBES
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-15 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 19:58 Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support Russell King
2008-01-15 10:45 ` Russell King
2008-01-15 12:02 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-15 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-15 16:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 17:02 ` Russell King
2008-01-15 17:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-15 19:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 19:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-15 19:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-15 17:49 ` Russell King
2008-01-15 18:06 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080115120239.GA14260@movial.fi \
--to=adrian.bunk@movial.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox