public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	phil.el@wanadoo.fr, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:50:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080115195057.GA14152@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080115191623.GA19694@uranus.ravnborg.org>

* Sam Ravnborg (sam@ravnborg.org) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:07:20PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Well, it goes along the lines of the patch I suggested as a reply to
> > > > Adrian, with these differences :
> > > > 
> > > > - I still source the kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation file.
> > > > - I put back the missing OPROFILE options directly in arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > > 
> > > > Then end result is the same as your patch, but without the code
> > > > duplication.
> > > 
> > > No it's not.
> > > 
> > > Now the config variables may all be there, but the UI for the *menu* 
> > > system is broken (ie all the ARM profiling config options are now outside 
> > > the profiling menu).
> > > 
> > > Is that menu really needed? I dunno. But since it exists, it should be 
> > > correct.
> > > 
> > > 		Linus
> > 
> > There is an "instrumentation menu removal" patchset I've submitted to
> > Andrew for the next release cycle that moves the instrumentation menu
> > content into General setup (I did this following your advice).
> > 
> > Furthermore, on ARM, the OPROFILE_ARMV6, OPROFILE_MPCORE and
> > OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE are all "bool , default y" (equivalent to the
> > preferred def_bool y). Unless I am grossly mistaken, this is not
> > supposed to show up in the menus; it's just selected when the
> > dependencies are met.
> 
> This was the patch:
> +if OPROFILE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_ARMV6
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on CPU_V6 && !SMP
> +	select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_MPCORE
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on CPU_V6 && SMP
> +	select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +	bool
> +
> +endif
> 
> And none of these has a prompt defined so they do not show up
> as a menu.
> It is very easy to test if you have the patch applied.
> No cross toolchin is needed - just do:
> make ARCH=arm menuconfig
> 
> 	Sam

Just tested with and without oprofile/MPCORE/CPU_V6 combinations and I
confirm that :

- no menu is showing up (as expected)
- the OPROFILE_* config options are selected (or not) as expected

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-15 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-28 19:58 Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support Russell King
2008-01-15 10:45 ` Russell King
2008-01-15 12:02   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-15 14:05     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 16:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-15 16:32     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 17:02     ` Russell King
2008-01-15 17:37     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 18:52       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-15 19:07         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-15 19:16           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-15 19:50             ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-01-15 20:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-15 17:49     ` Russell King
2008-01-15 18:06       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080115195057.GA14152@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=adrian.bunk@movial.fi \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox