From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Colin Fowler <elethiomel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: Performance loss 2.6.22->22.6.23->2.6.24-rc7 on CPU intensive benchmark on 8 Core Xeon
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080115220641.GC2665@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf3edd8d0801150901p653edeear62d5bc91d9f46981@mail.gmail.com>
* Colin Fowler <elethiomel@gmail.com> wrote:
> These data may be much better for you. It's a single 15 second data
> collection run only when the actual ray-tracing is happening. These
> data do not therefore cover the data structure building phase.
>
> http://vangogh.cs.tcd.ie/fowler/cfs2/
hm, the system has considerable idle time left:
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
8 0 0 1201920 683840 1039100 0 0 3 2 27 46 1 0 99 0
2 0 0 1202168 683840 1039112 0 0 0 0 245 45339 80 2 17 0
2 0 0 1202168 683840 1039112 0 0 0 0 263 47349 84 3 14 0
2 0 0 1202300 683848 1039112 0 0 0 76 255 47057 84 3 13 0
and context-switches 45K times a second. Do you know what is going on
there? I thought ray-tracing is something that can be parallelized
pretty efficiently, without having to contend and schedule too much.
could you try to do a similar capture on 2.6.22 as well (under the same
phase of the same workload), as comparison?
there are a handful of 'scheduler feature bits' in
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_features:
enum {
SCHED_FEAT_NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS = 1,
SCHED_FEAT_WAKEUP_PREEMPT = 2,
SCHED_FEAT_START_DEBIT = 4,
SCHED_FEAT_TREE_AVG = 8,
SCHED_FEAT_APPROX_AVG = 16,
};
const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_features =
SCHED_FEAT_NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS * 1 |
SCHED_FEAT_WAKEUP_PREEMPT * 1 |
SCHED_FEAT_START_DEBIT * 1 |
SCHED_FEAT_TREE_AVG * 0 |
SCHED_FEAT_APPROX_AVG * 0;
[as of 2.6.24-rc7]
could you try to turn some of them off/on. In particular toggling
WAKEUP_PREEMPT might have an effect, and NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS might have an
effect as well. (TREE_AVG and APPROX_AVG has probably little effect)
other debug-tunables you might want to look into are in the
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_domains hierarchy.
also, if you toggle:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
does that change the results?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-15 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-14 17:37 Performance loss 2.6.22->22.6.23->2.6.24-rc7 on CPU intensive benchmark on 8 Core Xeon Colin Fowler
2008-01-14 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 22:42 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-14 22:43 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-15 17:01 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-15 22:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-15 23:05 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-16 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 16:10 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-16 16:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 16:38 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-16 17:34 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-18 10:55 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080115220641.GC2665@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=elethiomel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox