From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759477AbYARMDV (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:03:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753141AbYARMDO (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:03:14 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56621 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751189AbYARMDN (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:03:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:02:48 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Harvey Harrison , Adrian Bunk , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] x86: allow 64bit setting in Kconfig Message-ID: <20080118120248.GA11044@elte.hu> References: <20080117214301.GA28233@does.not.exist> <20080118104401.GA8785@elte.hu> <1200653448.5724.135.camel@brick> <20080118113744.GA17447@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080118113744.GA17447@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Style question, would the following be preferred? > > > > config 64BIT > > def_bool ARCH = "x86_64" > > prompt "64-bit kernel" > > help... > > No. > It is most common to let the prompt follow the type and not > as a separate property. hm, ok. I guess there's not much cleanliness difference between: bool "64-bit kernel" default ARCH = "x86_64" and: def_bool ARCH = "x86_64" prompt "64-bit kernel" Ingo