From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759777AbYARMJS (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:09:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756388AbYARMJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:09:04 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:44997 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756468AbYARMJD (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:09:03 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:08:40 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: travis@sgi.com, Andi Kleen , Eric Dumazet , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Fixup NR-CPUS patch for numa Message-ID: <20080118120840.GE11044@elte.hu> References: <20080116183438.506737000@sgi.com> <20080116183438.636758000@sgi.com> <20080117103000.5e97dcd2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117103000.5e97dcd2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton wrote: > > Also, the mem -> node hash lookup is fixed. > > > > Based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 + change-NR_CPUS-V3 patchset > > hm, I've been hiding from those patches. > > Are they ready? i'm carrying them in x86.git, and they are pretty robust, with one outstanding build failure. ( and i've asked Mike for a CONFIG_SMP_MAX debug option that selects the baddest high-end features we have with 1024 or 4096 CPUs, etc. - this way allyesconfig bootups will show us any problems on that scale of the spectrum. ) Ingo