From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Ash Willis <ashwillis@programmer.net>,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Makes lguest's irq handler typesafe
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:59:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801191459.49735.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47915614.7080608@gmail.com>
On Saturday 19 January 2008 12:44:52 Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > so I think the question is "do we want to change all callbacks to
> > take native pointer type instead of void pointer?".
>
> Lemme clarity myself a bit. I'm not saying that we should convert all
> at once or literally every callback should be converted. What I'm
> saying is whether we're headed that way in general and converting big
> ones - timer for example - and getting the conversion agreed upon should
> be enough to set the norm.
Hi Tejun
There are three possibilities: (1) force everyone to use void *, (2) force
everyone to be type-correct, (3) allow both with some tricks. Currently
we're on (1). For kthread, with only dozens of users, I chose (2) (very
simple, easy to understand). I think for widespread things like timer and
interrupt handlers, I think (3) is the right way to go.
I wanted to get this patch out there and see what the reaction was. I can
do timers next, if that's going to add fuel to the discussion.
Thanks!
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-19 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 20:22 [PATCH 1/3] Improve type handling in interrupt handlers Rusty Russell
2008-01-18 20:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] Make IRQ handlers typesafe Rusty Russell
2008-01-18 20:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] Makes lguest's irq handler typesafe Rusty Russell
2008-01-18 20:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-18 22:17 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-18 23:12 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-19 1:28 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-19 1:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-19 1:44 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-19 3:59 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-01-19 4:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-19 23:27 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] Make IRQ handlers typesafe Jeff Garzik
2008-01-18 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] Improve type handling in interrupt handlers Jeff Garzik
2008-01-18 22:11 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-18 22:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-19 1:29 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801191459.49735.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashwillis@programmer.net \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).