From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix early_ioremap on x86-64
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:59:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080120175955.GA4993@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080120172840.GA24608@basil.nowhere.org>
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Fix early_ioremap on x86-64
>
> [Venki, sorry for blaming PAT for this earlier. It was innocent.]
> [Note the patch is on top of git-x86 + gbpages applied. I think there
> will be an trivial reject without gbpages-direct applied first]
>
> I had ACPI failures on several machines since a few days. Symptom was
> NUMA nodes not getting detected or worse cores not getting detected.
> They all came from ACPI not being able to read various of its tables.
> I finally bisected it down to Jeremy's "put _PAGE_GLOBAL into
> PAGE_KERNEL" change. With that the fix was fairly obvious. The problem
> was that early_ioremap() didn't use a "_all" flush that would affect
> the global PTEs too. So with global bits getting used everywhere now
> an early_ioremap would not actually flush a mapping if something else
> was mapped previously on that slot (which can happen with
> early_iounmap inbetween)
>
> This patch changes all flushes in init_64.c to be __flush_tlb_all()
> and fixes the problem here.
ah, very nice! This is the bad commit:
------------------------->
Subject: x86: fold _PAGE_GLOBAL into __PAGE_KERNEL
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
With the iounmap problem resolved, it should be OK to always set
_PAGE_GLOBAL in __PAGE_KERNEL*.
[ Did this patch cause problems before? ]
<------------------------
Jeremy did suspect something about this change, as indicated in the
changelog. But because the change was so finegrained, the bisection
almost directly led to the fix. _That_ i think clearly demonstrates the
power of bisection and finegrained changes.
but note what the fundamental problem is - we've turned a previously
safe flushing API into an unsafe one - __flush_tlb() will only be safe
in the rarest of circumstances. There are some other matches:
./mm/init_64.c: __flush_tlb();
./kernel/head64.c: __flush_tlb();
The boot identity mappings zapped do not have PGE set at the moment, but
they could in the future (once we do native pagetable setup straight
from flat mode) - and this is not a performance critical path anyway.
./kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c: __flush_tlb();
./kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c: __flush_tlb();
these include an open-coded version of __flush_tlb_all() so they are
safe.
and we might as well make the non-PGE flush the 'special API'. I.e.
rename __flush_tlb() to __flush_tlb_partial() and rename
__flush_tlb_all() to __flush_tlb(). This makes it very apparent which
should be used by default and which does what.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-20 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-20 17:28 [PATCH] Fix early_ioremap on x86-64 Andi Kleen
2008-01-20 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-20 19:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-21 0:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-20 18:04 ` [PATCH] Fix early_ioremap on x86-64 II Andi Kleen
2008-01-21 19:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080120175955.GA4993@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).