From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Rescheduling interrupts
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:57:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080122105741.GG21149@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801220119.42312.caglar@pardus.org.tr>
* S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr> wrote:
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 59,9% (238,4) <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 14,7% ( 58,6) amarokapp : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
hm, would be nice to figure out what causes these IPIs. Could you stick
something like this into arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c's
smp_send_reschedule() function [this is the function that generates the
IPI]:
static void native_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
{
WARN_ON(cpu_is_offline(cpu));
send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of_cpu(cpu), RESCHEDULE_VECTOR);
if (panic_timeout > 0) {
panic_timeout--;
printk("IPI from task %s:%d on CPU#%d:\n",
current->comm, current->pid, cpu);
dump_stack();
}
}
NOTE: if you run an SMP kernel then first remove these two lines from
kernel/printk.c:
if (!oops_in_progress && waitqueue_active(&log_wait))
wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
otherwise you'll get lockups. (the IPI is sent while holding the
runqueue lock, so the printks will lock up)
then wait for the bad condition to occur on your system and generate a
stream of ~10 backtraces, via:
echo 10 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic
you should be getting 10 immediate backtraces - please send them to us.
The backtraces should show the place that generates the wakeups. [turn
on CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS=y to get high quality backtraces.]
If you do _not_ get 10 immediate backtraces, then something in the
system is generating such IPIs outside of the scheduler's control. That
would suggest some other sort of borkage.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-21 23:19 Rescheduling interrupts S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-22 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-22 12:55 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-22 15:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-22 15:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-22 16:00 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-22 15:55 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-22 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-22 16:11 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-22 16:22 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2008-01-22 17:03 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-22 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <p73fxwoncs4.fsf@crumb.suse.de>
2008-01-23 15:52 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-13 18:03 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13 19:04 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080122105741.GG21149@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox