From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@openvz.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:31:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123133149.GA4059@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0801172000430.32679@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Hi!
> I thought that one could place a printk anywhere without worrying.
> But it seems that it is not wise to place a printk where the runqueue
> lock is held.
>
> I just spent two hours debugging why some of my code was locking up,
> to find that the lockup was caused by some debugging printk's that
> I had in the scheduler. The printk's were only in rare paths so
> they shouldn't be too much of a problem, but after I hit the printk
> the system locked up.
>
> Thinking that it was locking up on my code I went looking down the
> wrong path. I finally found (after examining an NMI dump) that
> the lockup happened because printk was trying to wakeup the klogd
> daemon, which caused a deadlock when the try_to_wakeup code tries
> to grab the runqueue lock.
Could try_to_wakeup use trylock, and only avoid wakeup if lock is
already held?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-23 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 1:04 [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-18 1:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-18 1:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 11:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-01-18 11:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 14:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-18 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-23 13:31 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-01-23 18:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-24 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080123133149.GA4059@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=adobriyan@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox