Re: CONFIG_MARKERS

Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-01-23T03:02:03Z

Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> writes:

> I notice in module.c:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS
> if (!mod->taints)
> marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers,
> mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL);
> #endif
>
> Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...]

I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect. If this is the
intent, it seems misguided to me. There may instead be a relationship
to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}. Mathieu?

- FChE