From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ioremap_nocache fix
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:27:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080125102738.GQ23708@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201238561.15972.17.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
* Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug of ioremap_nocache. ioremap_nocache() will call
> __ioremap() with flags != 0 to do the real work, which will call
> change_page_attr_addr() if phys_addr + size - 1 < (end_pfn_map <<
> PAGE_SHIFT). But some pages between 0 ~ end_pfn_map << PAGE_SHIFT are
> not mapped by identity map, this will make change_page_attr_addr
> failed.
very interesting! Is this in response to a bug you've triggered?
i believe the scenario you outlne could trigger on 64-bit boxen, if they
try to ioremap an area not covered by the direct ptes:
> @@ -41,8 +41,15 @@ ioremap_change_attr(unsigned long phys_a
> if (phys_addr + size - 1 < (end_pfn_map << PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> unsigned long npages = (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long) __va(phys_addr);
> + int level;
>
> /*
> + * If there is no identity map for this address,
> + * change_page_attr_addr is unnecessary
> + */
> + if (!lookup_address(vaddr, &level))
> + return err;
> + /*
and we'd incorrectly fail the ioremap() with -EINVAL, and return a hard
error to the driver - and causing broken boxes, right?
Thomas has unified most of ioremap*.c as well, and we'll make sure this
fix survives the unification. The 64-bit code limped along before by
accident, because the (pre-cleanup) 64-bit __change_page_attr() code
incorrectly returned 0 for invalid ranges:
kpte = lookup_address(address);
if (!kpte) return 0;
which masked the bug you fixed now. 32-bit always returned -EINVAL on
invalid ranges.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-25 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 5:22 [PATCH] x86: ioremap_nocache fix Huang, Ying
2008-01-25 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-25 13:50 ` huang ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080125102738.GQ23708@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox