From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@vision.unipv.it>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/5] b43: Avoid unregistering device objects during suspend
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:16:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080125211618.GA2261@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801250955210.4190-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Fri 2008-01-25 09:58:00, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should have global suspend_in_progress (or maybe system_state
> > == suspending?) and automatically switch to schedule_removal() while
> > it is set?
>
> :-) There was a time a couple of years ago when you objected violently
> to the mere suggestion of such a global variable!
Lets say I was young at stupid...? ;-).
> It's not a bad idea IMO. But if it does get implemented, a global
> function would be better than a global variable. It would provide
> more encapsulation.
Agreed.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-25 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 0:27 [PATCH -mm 0/5] b43: Fix suspend/resume deadlock Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 0:30 ` [PATCH -mm 1/5] PM: Export device_pm_schedule_removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 7:44 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-28 17:59 ` patch pm-export-device_pm_schedule_removal.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2008-01-25 0:31 ` [PATCH -mm 2/5] Misc: Add possibility to remove misc devices during suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 0:35 ` [PATCH -mm 3/5] HWRNG: Add possibility to remove hwrng " Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 0:36 ` [PATCH -mm 4/5] Leds: Add possibility to remove leds classdevs " Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 0:37 ` [PATCH -mm 5/5] b43: Avoid unregistering device objects during suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 7:47 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-25 10:13 ` Michael Buesch
2008-01-25 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-25 14:58 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-25 21:16 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080125211618.GA2261@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=rubini@vision.unipv.it \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox