public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (ondemand) CPU governor  regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:45:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080126214534.GA26651@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801262238.19222.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>

Added Ingo + Peter.

	Sam

On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> It seems to be rather a scheduler issue than a governor issue b/c
> the issue went away after unsetting CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
> 
> If I unselect CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED then the %CPU value raises 80%
> - which forces the ondemand governor do speed up the CPU frequency:
> 
> 
>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
>  7137 tfoerste  20   0  1796  488  428 R 95.5  0.0   0:01.40 factor
>  7083 dnetc     39  19   664  348  264 R  2.1  0.0   3:08.33 dnetc
>  4033 root      20   0 97252 9420 4008 R  0.7  0.9   0:09.43 X
>  
> 
> Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> > Toralf Förster wrote:
> > 
> > > I use a 1-liner for a simple performance check : "time factor 819734028463158891"
> > > Here is the result for the new (Gentoo) kernel 2.6.24:
> > > 
> > > With the  ondemand governor of the  I get:
> > > 
> > > tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ time factor 819734028463158891
> > > 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
> > > 
> > > real    0m32.997s
> > > user    0m15.732s
> > > sys     0m0.014s
> > > 
> > > With the ondemand governor the CPU runs at 600 MHz,
> > > whereas with the performance governor I get :
> > > 
> > > tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ time factor 819734028463158891
> > > 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
> > > 
> > > real    0m10.893s
> > > user    0m5.444s
> > > sys     0m0.000s
> > > 
> > > (~5.5 sec as I expected) b/c the CPU is set to 1.7 GHz.
> > > 
> > > The ondeman governor of previous kernel versions however automatically increased
> > > the CPU speed from 600 MHz to 1.7 GHz.
> > > 
> > > My system is a ThinkPad T41, I'll attach the .config 
> > 
> > During the test, run top, and watch your CPU usage. Does it go above 80% 
> > (the default for 
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold).
> > 
> > ondemand CPUfreq governor has a few tunables, described in 
> > Documentation/cpu-freq. One of them is up_threshold:
> > 
> > up_threshold: defines what the average CPU usaged between the samplings
> > of 'sampling_rate' needs to be for the kernel to make a decision on
> > whether it should increase the frequency. For example when it is set
> > to its default value of '80' it means that between the checking
> > intervals the CPU needs to be on average more than 80% in use to then
> > decide that the CPU frequency needs to be increased.
> > 
> > What CPUFreq processor driver are you using?
> > 
> > 
> > I had a similar problem with CPUfreq and dm-crypt (slow reads), see 
> > (more setup problem than something kernel-related):
> > 
> > http://blog.wpkg.org/2008/01/22/cpufreq-and-dm-crypt-performance-problems/
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> MfG/Sincerely
> 
> Toralf Förster
> pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3



  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-26 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-26 17:11 (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-01-26 18:46 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 14:46   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-01-27 15:06     ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 16:54       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-01-27 16:57         ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 21:27           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-27 22:32             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-28  8:38           ` Helge Hafting
2008-01-26 21:38 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-26 21:45   ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
     [not found] ` <200801271200.04971.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
     [not found]   ` <1201433167.22060.10.camel@homer.simson.net>
2008-01-27 12:39     ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 18:58       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-01-27 21:14         ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 21:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-28 13:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-28 15:16             ` Toralf Förster
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-26 14:06 Toralf Förster
2008-02-04  0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04  0:36   ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 17:44   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-02-04 19:18     ` Toralf Förster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080126214534.GA26651@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox