From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Toralf.=?iso-8859-1?Q?F=F6rster_=3Ctoralf=2Efoerster=40gmx=2Ede=3E?=@snowy.in.ibm.com
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:24:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080127165400.GB1044@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801271606.19862.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:06:17PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> > The third line (giving overall cpu usage stats) is what is interesting here.
> > If you have more than one cpu, you can get cpu usage stats for each cpu
> > in top by pressing 1. Can you provide this information with and w/o
> > CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED?
>
> This is what I get if I set CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED to "y"
>
> top - 16:00:59 up 2 min, 1 user, load average: 2.56, 1.60, 0.65
> Tasks: 84 total, 3 running, 81 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 49.7%us, 0.3%sy, 49.7%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 1036180k total, 322876k used, 713304k free, 13164k buffers
> Swap: 997880k total, 0k used, 997880k free, 149208k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 6070 dnetc 39 19 664 348 264 R 49.7 0.0 1:09.71 dnetc
> 6676 tfoerste 20 0 1796 488 428 R 49.3 0.0 0:02.72 factor
>
> Stopping dnetc gives:
>
> top - 16:02:36 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 2.50, 1.87, 0.83
> Tasks: 89 total, 3 running, 86 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 99.3%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 1036180k total, 378760k used, 657420k free, 14736k buffers
> Swap: 997880k total, 0k used, 997880k free, 180868k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 6766 tfoerste 20 0 1796 488 428 R 84.9 0.0 0:05.41 factor
Thanks for this respone. This confirms that cpu's idle time is close to
zero, as I intended to verify.
> > If I am not mistaken, cpu ondemand gov goes by the cpu idle time stats,
> > which should not be affected by FAIR_GROUP_SCHED. I will lookaround for
> > other possible causes.
On further examination, ondemand governor seems to have a tunable to
ignore nice load. In your case, I see that dnetc is running at a
positive nice value (19) which could explain why ondemand gov thinks
that the cpu is only ~50% loaded.
Can you check what is the setting of this knob in your case?
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/ignore_nice_load
You can set that to 0 to ask ondemand gov to include nice load into
account while calculating cpu freq changes:
# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/ignore_nice_load
This should restore the behavior of ondemand governor as seen in 2.6.23
in your case (even with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled). Can you pls confirm
if that happens?
> As I stated our in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/207 the issue is solved
> after unselecting FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
I understand, but we want to keep CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled by
default.
Ingo,
Most folks seem to be used to a global nice-domain, where a nice 19
task gives up cpu in competetion to a nice-0 task (irrespective of which
userid's they belong to). CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED brings noticeable changes wrt
that. We could possibly let it be as it is (since that is what a server
admin may possibly want when managing university servers) or modify it to be
aware of nice-level (priority of user-sched entity is equivalent to highest
prio task it has).
In any case, I will send across a patch to turn off CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED by
default (and instead turn on CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED by default).
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-27 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-26 17:11 (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-01-26 18:46 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 14:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-01-27 15:06 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 16:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2008-01-27 16:57 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 21:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-27 22:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-28 8:38 ` Helge Hafting
2008-01-26 21:38 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-26 21:45 ` Sam Ravnborg
[not found] ` <200801271200.04971.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <1201433167.22060.10.camel@homer.simson.net>
2008-01-27 12:39 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 18:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-01-27 21:14 ` Toralf Förster
2008-01-27 21:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-28 13:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-28 15:16 ` Toralf Förster
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-26 14:06 Toralf Förster
2008-02-04 0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 17:44 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-02-04 19:18 ` Toralf Förster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080127165400.GB1044@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Toralf.=?iso-8859-1?Q?F=F6rster_=3Ctoralf=2Efoerster=40gmx=2Ede=3E?=@snowy.in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox