public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, risrajak@in.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] [TEST] : LTP Build failure on 2.6.24 kernel
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:29:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080128202929.GB8767@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801280653.16624.vapier@gentoo.org>

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:53:15AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote:
> > Here i am getting failure on the x86_64 machine with new kernel.
> >
> > Here is the uname for that machine:
> >
> > rishi@:~/ltp-full-20071231# uname -a
> > Linux rishi.in.ibm.com 2.6.24 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jan 28 06:47:28 UTC
> > 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> i'm guessing you're using ubuntu and thus dash is your /bin/sh ... shouldnt be 
> a 2.6.24 issue
> 
> > make[4]: Entering directory
> > `/root/ltp-full-20071231/testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ftp'
> > ../../generate.sh
> > ../../generate.sh: 60: arith: syntax error: "cnt=cnt-1"
> 
> sadly, this is becoming a FAQ.  ubuntu ships a broken /bin/sh (dash) and thus 
> some LTP scripts fall apart.  i would prefer to not change the scripts as the 
> message is simple in LTP: fix your shell, dont add hacks to LTP.  otherwise 
> we slowly back ourselves into this corner with the shell scripts where we try 
> to support every craptastic shell out there and we're afraid to make any 
> changes because we dont know what crappy shell is going to drop a brick.  LTP 
> scripts are written to be POSIX complaint and only POSIX complaint shells 
> should be provided by /bin/sh.

You better fulfil your claim "LTP scripts are written to be POSIX 
complaint" before complaining about shells being unhappy with your 
script. E.g. where in IEEE 1003.1-2004 is the "local" you use specified?

Or instead of working on making your script using only the stuff 
specified in IEEE 1003.1-2004 you could simply replace the #!/bin/sh at 
the top with a #!/bin/bash and everbody will be happy.

> -mike

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-28 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1201508081.4029.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2008-01-28 11:53 ` [LTP] [TEST] : LTP Build failure on 2.6.24 kernel Mike Frysinger
2008-01-28 20:29   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-28 20:43     ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-28 21:10       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28 21:21         ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-28 21:46           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28 23:36             ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080128202929.GB8767@does.not.exist \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=risrajak@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox