From: pierre.peiffer@bull.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 02/15] IPC/shared memory: introduce shmctl_down
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:02:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080129161626.350090860@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080129160229.612172683@bull.net
[-- Attachment #1: ipc_introduce_shmctl_down.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4950 bytes --]
From: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net>
Currently, the way the different commands are handled in sys_shmctl
introduces some duplicated code.
This patch introduces the shmctl_down function to handle all the commands
requiring the rwmutex to be taken in write mode (ie IPC_SET and IPC_RMID
for now). It is the equivalent function of semctl_down for shared
memory.
This removes some duplicated code for handling these both commands
and harmonizes the way they are handled among all IPCs.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
---
ipc/shm.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
Index: b/ipc/shm.c
===================================================================
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -625,10 +625,78 @@ static void shm_get_stat(struct ipc_name
}
}
-asmlinkage long sys_shmctl (int shmid, int cmd, struct shmid_ds __user *buf)
+/*
+ * This function handles some shmctl commands which require the rw_mutex
+ * to be held in write mode.
+ * NOTE: no locks must be held, the rw_mutex is taken inside this function.
+ */
+static int shmctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int shmid, int cmd,
+ struct shmid_ds __user *buf, int version)
{
+ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp;
struct shm_setbuf setbuf;
struct shmid_kernel *shp;
+ int err;
+
+ if (cmd == IPC_SET) {
+ if (copy_shmid_from_user(&setbuf, buf, version))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
+ shp = shm_lock_check_down(ns, shmid);
+ if (IS_ERR(shp)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(shp);
+ goto out_up;
+ }
+
+ ipcp = &shp->shm_perm;
+
+ err = audit_ipc_obj(ipcp);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ if (cmd == IPC_SET) {
+ err = audit_ipc_set_perm(0, setbuf.uid,
+ setbuf.gid, setbuf.mode);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (current->euid != ipcp->uid &&
+ current->euid != ipcp->cuid &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
+ err = -EPERM;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ err = security_shm_shmctl(shp, cmd);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_unlock;
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case IPC_RMID:
+ do_shm_rmid(ns, ipcp);
+ goto out_up;
+ case IPC_SET:
+ ipcp->uid = setbuf.uid;
+ ipcp->gid = setbuf.gid;
+ ipcp->mode = (ipcp->mode & ~S_IRWXUGO)
+ | (setbuf.mode & S_IRWXUGO);
+ shp->shm_ctim = get_seconds();
+ break;
+ default:
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ }
+out_unlock:
+ shm_unlock(shp);
+out_up:
+ up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
+ return err;
+}
+
+asmlinkage long sys_shmctl(int shmid, int cmd, struct shmid_ds __user *buf)
+{
+ struct shmid_kernel *shp;
int err, version;
struct ipc_namespace *ns;
@@ -784,97 +852,13 @@ asmlinkage long sys_shmctl (int shmid, i
goto out;
}
case IPC_RMID:
- {
- /*
- * We cannot simply remove the file. The SVID states
- * that the block remains until the last person
- * detaches from it, then is deleted. A shmat() on
- * an RMID segment is legal in older Linux and if
- * we change it apps break...
- *
- * Instead we set a destroyed flag, and then blow
- * the name away when the usage hits zero.
- */
- down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
- shp = shm_lock_check_down(ns, shmid);
- if (IS_ERR(shp)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(shp);
- goto out_up;
- }
-
- err = audit_ipc_obj(&(shp->shm_perm));
- if (err)
- goto out_unlock_up;
-
- if (current->euid != shp->shm_perm.uid &&
- current->euid != shp->shm_perm.cuid &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
- err=-EPERM;
- goto out_unlock_up;
- }
-
- err = security_shm_shmctl(shp, cmd);
- if (err)
- goto out_unlock_up;
-
- do_shm_rmid(ns, &shp->shm_perm);
- up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
- goto out;
- }
-
case IPC_SET:
- {
- if (!buf) {
- err = -EFAULT;
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (copy_shmid_from_user (&setbuf, buf, version)) {
- err = -EFAULT;
- goto out;
- }
- down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
- shp = shm_lock_check_down(ns, shmid);
- if (IS_ERR(shp)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(shp);
- goto out_up;
- }
- err = audit_ipc_obj(&(shp->shm_perm));
- if (err)
- goto out_unlock_up;
- err = audit_ipc_set_perm(0, setbuf.uid, setbuf.gid, setbuf.mode);
- if (err)
- goto out_unlock_up;
- err=-EPERM;
- if (current->euid != shp->shm_perm.uid &&
- current->euid != shp->shm_perm.cuid &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
- goto out_unlock_up;
- }
-
- err = security_shm_shmctl(shp, cmd);
- if (err)
- goto out_unlock_up;
-
- shp->shm_perm.uid = setbuf.uid;
- shp->shm_perm.gid = setbuf.gid;
- shp->shm_perm.mode = (shp->shm_perm.mode & ~S_IRWXUGO)
- | (setbuf.mode & S_IRWXUGO);
- shp->shm_ctim = get_seconds();
- break;
- }
-
+ err = shmctl_down(ns, shmid, cmd, buf, version);
+ return err;
default:
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
- err = 0;
-out_unlock_up:
- shm_unlock(shp);
-out_up:
- up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
- goto out;
out_unlock:
shm_unlock(shp);
out:
--
Pierre Peiffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-29 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-29 16:02 [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 00/15] IPC: code rewrite + new functionalities pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 01/15] IPC/semaphores: code factorisation pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` pierre.peiffer [this message]
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 03/15] IPC/message queues: introduce msgctl_down pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 04/15] IPC/semaphores: move the rwmutex handling inside semctl_down pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 05/15] IPC/semaphores: remove one unused parameter from semctl_down() pierre.peiffer
2008-01-31 8:32 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-01-31 10:18 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-31 11:30 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 06/15] IPC: get rid of the use *_setbuf structure pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 07/15] IPC: introduce ipc_update_perm() pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 08/15] IPC: consolidate all xxxctl_down() functions pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 09/15] (RFC) IPC: new kernel API to change an ID pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 21:06 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-01-30 9:52 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-31 9:00 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-31 9:54 ` Kirill Korotaev
2008-01-31 11:57 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-31 13:11 ` Kirill Korotaev
2008-01-31 16:10 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-02-04 13:41 ` Kirill Korotaev
2008-02-04 14:06 ` [Devel] " Pavel Emelyanov
2008-02-04 15:00 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-02-04 15:16 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-02-05 9:51 ` Oren Laadan
2008-02-05 18:00 ` Dave Hansen
2008-02-05 18:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-02-06 2:07 ` Oren Laadan
2008-02-06 5:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-02-08 10:12 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 10/15] (RFC) IPC: new IPC_SETID command to modify " pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 11/15] (RFC) IPC: new IPC_SETALL command to modify all settings pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 12/15] (RFC) IPC/semaphores: make use of RCU to free the sem_undo_list pierre.peiffer
2008-01-30 21:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-01-31 9:52 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 13/15] (RFC) IPC/semaphores: per <pid> semundo file in procfs pierre.peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 14/15] (RFC) IPC/semaphores: prepare semundo code to work on another task than current pierre.peiffer
2008-01-30 21:44 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-01-31 9:48 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-31 18:01 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-02-01 12:09 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-01-29 16:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 15/15] (RFC) IPC/semaphores: add write() operation to semundo file in procfs pierre.peiffer
2008-02-02 18:23 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 00/15] IPC: code rewrite + new functionalities Pavel Machek
2008-02-04 13:52 ` Pierre Peiffer
2008-02-04 15:44 ` Benjamin Thery
2008-02-04 19:51 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080129161626.350090860@bull.net \
--to=pierre.peiffer@bull.net \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox