From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git7: section mismatches woes
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:08:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080130190829.GA25490@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801301950.44403.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get these messages, the majority of which seem to be false-positives:
...
> modpost: Found 35 section mismatch(es).
> To see additional details select "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> in the Kernel Hacking menu (CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH).
Looking in to these atm.
>
> and if I compile the kernel with CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH, it breaks resuming
> from RAM.
The only functional difference when you enable CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH is the
addition of the -fno-inline-functions-called-once to CFLAGS.
So we have some code somewhere that breaks if it is not inlined by gcc.
It would be nice to sort out where.
If you have a rough idea where to look you could use the following trick.
Drop CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH and build a kernel.
Then for the file/directory where you think the no-inle makes
a difference do:
# To build the dir/file
rm dir/*.o
make KBUILD_NOCMDDEP=1 KCFLAGS=-fno-inline-functions-called-once dir/
# And then link the kernel
make KBUILD_NOCMDDEP=1
The KBUILD_NOCMDDEP=1 tell kbuild to ignore any commandline differences
so kbuild will not rebuild due to changed gcc flags.
Let me know if you need assistance with this.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-30 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 18:50 2.6.24-git7: section mismatches woes Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-30 19:08 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-01-30 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-02 18:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-02 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 10:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-03 12:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 12:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080130190829.GA25490@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox