From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758715AbYAaGLl (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:11:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752451AbYAaGLb (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:11:31 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:34694 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752319AbYAaGLa (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:11:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:11:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH mm] Remove deprecation of a.out ELF interpreters Message-Id: <20080130221138.97cc32f1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080131030919.GA27115@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20080130084041.GA8429@basil.nowhere.org> <20080130152915.6e7d5865.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080131030919.GA27115@one.firstfloor.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:09:19 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:29:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:40:41 +0100 > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > > > Andrew has already queued the patch to remove the support for a.out > > > ELF interpreters. So remove the deprecation with it too. > > > > > > > I'm trying to find which patch I might have queued which did this and came > > up blank. > > Sorry I somehow thought you had it queued. > > My patch makes parts of David's patch obsolete because he makes > the code ifdef, but I remove the code completely. David also > does some other cleanups which still make sense. > > So I think the correct way is to apply my patch first and then David's > and just ignore all the rejects and refresh. The result should be correct. > > Basically after that only the core dump changes in David's patch should > be left over. > > Can you do that or should I resubmit both patches in a merged form? > (I can do that too) > Your patch on top of rc8-mm1 would be simplest for me. I'm at a bit of a loss because I don't appear to have a copy of the patch which we're discussing handy.