From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765803AbYAaKGS (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:06:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752815AbYAaKGH (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:06:07 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:43658 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752570AbYAaKGD (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:06:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:05:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, mztabzr@0pointer.de, mpm@selenic.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory Message-Id: <20080131020516.be42c495.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1201773206.28547.259.camel@lappy> References: <1201714139.28547.237.camel@lappy> <20080130144049.73596898.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201769040.28547.245.camel@lappy> <20080131011227.257b9437.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201772118.28547.254.camel@lappy> <20080131014702.705f1040.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201773206.28547.259.camel@lappy> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:53:26 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 01:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:35:18 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 01:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Implementation-wise: make_pages_present() _can_ be converted to do this. > > > > But it's a lot of patching, and the result will be a cleaner, faster and > > > > smaller core MM. Whereas your approach is easy, but adds more code and > > > > leaves the old stuff slow-and-dirty. > > > > > > > > Guess which approach is preferred? ;) > > > > > > Ok, I'll look at using make_pages_present(). > > > > Am still curious to know what inspired this change. What are the use > > cases? Performance testing results, etc? > > Ah, that is Lennarts Pulse Audio thing, he has samples in memory which > might not have been used for a while, and he wants to be able to > pre-fetch those when he suspects they might need to be played. So that > once the audio thread comes along and stuffs them down /dev/dsp its all > nice in memory. > > Since its all soft real-time at best he feels its better to do a best > effort at not hitting swap than it is to strain the system with mlock > usage. hrm. Does he know about pthread_create()?