From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Value of __*{init,exit} anotations?
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:44:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131074436.GA31966@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130223219.GT29368@does.not.exist>
> >
> > I don't deny we can invest large amounts of work to fix our current
> > issues and build large scriptable checks to ensure we keep it fixed ...
> > I'm just asking if, at the end of the day, it's really worth it.
>
> Some people consider it worth it for their memory restricted systems
> and would like to drive the annotations even further. [1]
>
> My experience while fixing section bugs during the last years is that
> the __dev{init,exit}* are actually the main question since they are both
> the majority of annotations and the ones that bring benefits only
> in a case that has become very exotic (CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n).
Some numbers...
I my current tree with an allyesconfig build for x86 64bit I see:
136 Section mismatch warnings in total
99 Section mismatch warnings from drivers/
This is with a few patches of mine applied but none of the recently
posted fixes by Adrian.
I am concentrating on:
drivers/pci/
kernel/
mm/
Will post my patches during the weekend if things goes well.
There are some low hanging fruits in drivers/ but I stay away
from these from now expecting others to fix these.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 20:03 [2.6 patch] scsi/qlogicpti.c section fixes Adrian Bunk
2008-01-30 21:00 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-30 21:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-30 21:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-30 21:41 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-30 22:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-30 22:32 ` Value of __*{init,exit} anotations? Adrian Bunk
2008-01-30 22:44 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-30 22:50 ` Russell King
2008-01-31 5:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 7:44 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-01-31 15:57 ` [PATCH] kill hotplug init/exit section annotations James Bottomley
2008-01-31 16:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-31 16:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 17:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-31 17:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 17:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-01-31 17:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 18:32 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-01-31 18:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 17:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-31 18:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-31 18:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-31 19:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-30 22:28 ` [2.6 patch] scsi/qlogicpti.c section fixes Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080131074436.GA31966@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox