public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Russell Leidich" <rml@google.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, "Tim Hockin" <thockin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:10:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080202161057.b240f443.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f1a065b0801171706o57ae5d6w8a986db508ddcee4@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:33 -0800 "Russell Leidich" <rml@google.com> wrote:

> > Here's the hopefully-final version of the patch, which I have just
> > tested on Intel and AMD.

Curious.  This just broke.

i386 allmodconfig:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o: In function `smp_thermal_interrupt':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c:61: multiple definition of `smp_thermal_interrupt'
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.o:arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.c:17: first defined here
/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: size of symbol `smp_thermal_interrupt' changed from 4 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.o to 43 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o
/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: type of symbol `smp_thermal_interrupt' changed from 1 to 2 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o

In mainline we just did this:

--- linux-2.6.24/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c        2008-02-01 14:29:18.000000000 -0800
+++ devel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c       2008-02-02 15:38:06.000000000 -0800
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void intel_thermal_interrupt(stru
 /* Thermal interrupt handler for this CPU setup */
 static void (*vendor_thermal_interrupt)(struct pt_regs *regs) = unexpected_thermal_interrupt;
 
-fastcall void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
+void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)

which I think was always wrong and has just now tripped up the linker.  I
_assume_ that function should be __attribute__((weak)).  Then again, maybe
I'm full of it.  But hey, it compiles now.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-03  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-17 18:54 [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support Russell Leidich
2007-12-25 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-27 18:57   ` Russell Leidich
2007-12-28  7:34     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-28 20:40       ` Russell Leidich
2007-12-29  2:11         ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-29  2:30           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-12-29  2:34             ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-29  2:57               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-12-30 18:39         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-02 19:43           ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-02 20:00             ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-02 21:12               ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-02 21:33                 ` Torsten Kaiser
2008-01-02 21:50                   ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-02 21:54                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-02 22:32                       ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-04 21:33                       ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-04 22:26                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-05  0:53                           ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-05 13:24                             ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-05 20:08                               ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-08 23:42                                 ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-08 23:52                                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09  2:28                                     ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-09  2:37                                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-11  2:21                                         ` Russell Leidich
2008-01-18  1:06                                           ` Russell Leidich
2008-02-03  0:10                                             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-02-03  0:27                                               ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-03  0:39                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-03  0:50                                                   ` [PATCH] x86: Remove pt_regs arg from smp_thermal_interrupt Harvey Harrison
2008-02-03  1:01                                                     ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-04  7:12                                                       ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-11 18:44 [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support Russell Leidich
2007-12-11 19:13 ` Russell Leidich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080202161057.b240f443.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=just.for.lkml@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rml@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thockin@google.com \
    --cc=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox