From: "Ismail Dönmez" <ismail@pardus.org.tr>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>,
Linux Security Modules List
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:25:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802030825.49221.ismail@pardus.org.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080202221812.2f9d70a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
At Sunday 03 February 2008 around 08:18:12 Andrew Morton wrote:
> So how do we ever get to the stage where we can recommend that distributors
> turn these things on, and have them agree with us?
FWIW with my distributor hat on I think File system capabilities are very nice
and enables one to ship a distribution with a small set of setuid binaries.
On the other hand for per-process securebits, it would be nice to see a
complete example how it could be applied to a setuid program. That would be a
nice step in moving forward.
Regards,
ismail
--
Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-03 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-01 8:11 [PATCH] per-process securebits Andrew G. Morgan
2008-02-01 8:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-01 9:07 ` James Morris
2008-02-04 18:17 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-04 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-03 6:01 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-02-03 6:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-03 6:25 ` Ismail Dönmez [this message]
2008-02-04 0:49 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-02-04 0:54 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-02-04 1:10 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-02-04 16:45 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-02-05 1:15 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-02-01 20:15 ` serge
2008-02-03 6:11 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-02-05 18:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802030825.49221.ismail@pardus.org.tr \
--to=ismail@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox