public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: section breakage on ppc64 (aka __devinitconst is broken by design)
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080203210208.GU27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080203203002.GD2648@uranus.ravnborg.org>

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:30:02PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> And I'm suprised to see that gcc thinks bar is writeable.
> If I try to assign it gcc error out as expected.

That's because "not modifiable" and "goes into r/o section" are not the
same thing.  The former belongs to C and is target-independent, of course.
The latter is up to implementation, except that modifiable objects
obviously *can not* go into r/o.  You are not guaranteed the reverse.

> We could invent a __initstr annotation but I dunno if that would suffice.
> Do you see any pattern when gcc do the r/w choice compared to the
> r/o choise. Maybe it is only const char[] that happens to be considered
> r/o and the rest is r/w?

On ppc64 relocs => r/w, AFAICS.  On other targets we might have any number
of other rules.
 
> Should a gcc-bug be filed for this btw?

Why?  gcc is entirely within its rights - it's not even a matter of ABI,
it's way below that.  Note that you are meddling with section assignment
rules and those are target-dependent, so target-independent overrides
are nowhere near being promised to work.

Frankly, "do not ever make __initdata et.al. const" is probably the best
we can do - adding __initconst, __initconst_but_has_relocs,
__initconst_but_has_something_that_puts_it_into_writable_on_this_weird_target,
__initconst_but_has_something_that_puts_it_into_writable_on_that_weird_target,
etc. is not feasible - we'll keep getting portability bugs all the time since
nobody will remember all rules (or care about ones that do not apply on
amd64).

Suppose we have an array of ad-hoc structs with a bunch of ints
in those.  Used only in ->probe(), so __devinitdata.  Constant, so
__devinitconst (and no special per-target rules trigger on the current
struct contents).  Fast forward half a year; somebody adds a string field
to those.  Oops - suddenly it's __devinitconst_but_has_relocs, but author
of that patch has never heard of ppc64 oddities; on all targets he knows
__devinitconst still works fine.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-03 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-03 13:08 section breakage on ppc64 (aka __devinitconst is broken by design) Al Viro
2008-02-03 17:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-03 18:02   ` Al Viro
2008-02-03 20:30     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-03 21:02       ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-02-04  0:27         ` Olivier Galibert
2008-02-07 18:33 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-02-07 18:54   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-08  8:14     ` Jan Beulich
2008-02-08  8:47       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-08  9:17         ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080203210208.GU27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox