From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:36:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802050436.31070.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130011550.GA31853@elte.hu>
On Wednesday, 30 January 2008 03:15:50 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
>
> Find the shortlog attached below.
>
> Most of the changes we have described here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/21/230
>
> It's not a small merge, it consists of 908 commits from 96 individual
> arch/x86 developers (!):
>
> 671 files changed, 42791 insertions(+), 38967 deletions(-)
>
> so here are a few highlevel comments as well, in addition to the
> shortlog:
>
> - a number of core files are changed as well: most notably percpu,
> debugging details, timers, the firewire remote debugging patch and ...
> the KGDB remote debugging stub in kernel/kgdb.c.
>
> - we tested KGDB to be merge-worthy within the x86 architecture (the
> only supported architecture for now) and it's better to have
> kernel/kgdb.c than arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c. The code is reasonably
> clean and the user-space exposure is small - the only real exposure is
> the decades-old remote GDB protocol. We are happy to fix up any
> further cleanliness comments that people might have - but we really
> wanted to start somewhere and get this thing moving. As an added
> bonus: finally a kernel debugger that can be read without puking too
> much ;-) [anyone remember KDB?]
>
The x86 tree was merged several times, but I don't see kgdb included in
latest mainline -git.
So just one question, will it be included or no?
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-05 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 1:15 [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 0:33 ` x86 arch updates also broke s390 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 9:34 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-01-31 10:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 12:37 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-01 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 9:54 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-02-01 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 15:57 ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:21 ` WANG Cong
2008-01-31 16:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-31 16:29 ` sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-31 17:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 17:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-31 18:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 18:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 2:36 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2008-02-05 3:27 ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Linus Torvalds
2008-02-05 4:11 ` Phil Oester
2008-02-05 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 12:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-07 20:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2008-02-08 4:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-08 9:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-05 17:45 ` John Stoffel
2008-02-05 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-08 18:24 ` Bernhard Kaindl
2008-02-08 19:38 ` remote DMA via FireWire (was Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25) Stefan Richter
2008-02-07 19:20 ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Daniel Phillips
2008-02-08 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-08 17:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-08 18:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-08 21:28 ` [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling (was: Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25) Jan Kiszka
2008-02-08 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-08 22:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling Jason Wessel
2008-02-09 14:11 ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Amit Shah
2008-02-10 12:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-12 7:16 ` Amit Shah
2008-02-13 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-13 10:19 ` Amit Shah
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-06 2:28 David Cullen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802050436.31070.maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox