From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763743AbYBFCT4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:19:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761467AbYBFCTp (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:19:45 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:59930 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761365AbYBFCTo (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:19:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:19:42 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Andrew Morton Cc: Trond Myklebust , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Liam Howlett Subject: Re: Pull request: TASK_KILLABLE Message-ID: <20080206021942.GA21509@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080129000447.GC31101@parisc-linux.org> <20080131234504.GB25967@parisc-linux.org> <1201830304.3087.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20080131180205.20e7dece.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080131180205.20e7dece.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:02:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > No such export was needed in the patches which I added to -mm. So > something changed between then and now. Not sure abouut that problem -- still on holiday, so just checking ym mail quickly. > And going back through the mailing list all I can find is a series of five > patches in October - it's unclear where and when the other 17 were > reviewed, if they were. A large number of these patches are just a resplit of the patches sent back in October -- you complained they weren't split up enough. So I resplit them. And sent them to you. Asking if this was how you preferred it. Which you didn't reply to. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."