From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
len.brown@intel.com, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c] duplicate test if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:07:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080206230702.GA12395@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A81FAE.2090709@tiscali.nl>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Roel Kluin wrote:
> >> Roland Dreier wrote:
> >>> > /* safety net should the EC not support AUTO
> >>> > * or FULLSPEED mode bits and just ignore them */
> >>> > if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)
> >>> > level |= 7; /* safety min speed 7 */
> >>> > else if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)
> >>> > level |= 4; /* safety min speed 4 */
> >>> >
> >>> > Note the duplicate test 'if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)'. should
> >>> > this be replaced by
> >>>
> >>> Actually I suspect one of the two tests should be against TP_EC_FAN_AUTO
> >>> (based on the comment).
> >> Thanks Roland, for your info
> >>
> >> based on the comments in commit eaa7571b2d1a08873e4bdd8e6db3431df61cd9ad,
> >> I think this should be modified like below:
> >>
> >> ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: add a safety net for TPEC fan control mode
> >> The Linux ThinkPad community is not positive that all ThinkPads that do
> >> HFSP EC fan control do implement full-speed and auto modes, some of the
> >> earlier ones supporting HFSP might not.
> >>
> >> If the EC ignores the AUTO or FULL-SPEED bits, it will pay attention to the
> >> lower three bits that set the fan level. And as thinkpad-acpi was leaving
> >> these set to zero, it would stop(!) the fan, which is Not A Good Thing.
> >> So, as a safety net, we now make sure to also set the fan level part of the
> >> HFSP register to speed 7 for full-speed, and a minimum of speed 4 for auto
> >> mode.
> >> --
> >> second TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED should be P_EC_FAN_AUTO
> >>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
> >> index cf56647..3c323fe 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
> >> @@ -4138,7 +4138,7 @@ static int fan_set_level(int level)
> >> * or FULLSPEED mode bits and just ignore them */
> >> if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)
> >> level |= 7; /* safety min speed 7 */
> >> - else if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)
> >> + else if (level & TP_EC_FAN_AUTO)
> >> level |= 4; /* safety min speed 4 */
> >>
> >> if (!acpi_ec_write(fan_status_offset, level))
> >
> > ACK. This needs to be sent to stable as well. I think both 2.6.22 and
> > 2.6.23 need this patch.
> >
>
> CC stable@kernel.org
Please send us a real copy of the patch, when it goes into Linus's tree,
so we know what to apply, and that it is safe to do so.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-06 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-04 22:07 [drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c] duplicate test if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED) Roel Kluin
2008-02-04 22:13 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-04 23:24 ` [PATCH][drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c] " Roel Kluin
2008-02-05 5:05 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-05 8:34 ` Roel Kluin
2008-02-06 23:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-02-06 23:48 ` Roel Kluin
2008-02-07 1:18 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-07 7:28 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-02-07 5:55 ` Greg KH
2008-02-07 6:17 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-04 21:59 [PATCH][drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c] duplicate test 'if (level & TP_EC_FAN_FULLSPEED)' Roel kluin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080206230702.GA12395@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox