From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756640AbYBGIAN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:00:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754384AbYBGH77 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:59:59 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:60637 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752089AbYBGH76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:59:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:59:54 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: Andrew Morton Cc: maxk@qualcomm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions Message-Id: <20080207015954.92cd3878.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080206215805.17a0c919.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <47AA9807.7090402@qualcomm.com> <20080206215805.17a0c919.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew wrote: > (and bear in mind that Paul has a track record of being wrong > on this :)) heh - I saw that . Max - Andrew's about right, as usual. You answered my initial questions on this patch set adequately, but hard real time is not my expertise, so in the final analysis, other than my saying I don't have any more objections, my input doesn't mean much either way. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214