From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: section breakage on ppc64 (aka __devinitconst is broken by design)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:54:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080207185409.GA21145@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47AB4F0E.3050907@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:33:50PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 02/03/2008 08:08 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > The reason why it didn't visibly bite us before is that usually __devinit...
> > just expanded to nothing (unless you disable HOTPLUG, which requires
> > EMBEDDED, which wasn't apparently common enough for ppc64 builds).
> >
> > Suggestions?
>
> This ugly hackset was needed to get 2.6.24 to build with GCC 4.3. It would
> be nice to get a real fix...
I cannot see any other way out of this than to loose all the newly added
consts. We have to different behavior across platforms to find a suitable
solution that is reliable.
[Kept rest of mail as I added Jan - hope he have some ideas to throw in].
Sam
>
>
> --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,15 @@ struct kparam_array
> void *elem;
> };
>
> +/* On some platforms relocations to global data cannot go into read-only
> + sections, so 'const' makes no sense and even causes compile failures
> + with some compilers. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ALPHA) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> +#define __moduleparam_const
> +#else
> +#define __moduleparam_const const
> +#endif
> +
> /* This is the fundamental function for registering boot/module
> parameters. perm sets the visibility in sysfs: 000 means it's
> not there, read bits mean it's readable, write bits mean it's
> @@ -71,7 +80,7 @@ struct kparam_array
> static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \
> BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)); \
> static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name; \
> - static struct kernel_param const __param_##name \
> + static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name \
> __attribute_used__ \
> __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
> = { __param_str_##name, perm, set, get, { arg } }
> --- linux-2.6.24.noarch.orig/include/linux/module.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24.noarch/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@
>
> #define MODULE_NAME_LEN (64 - sizeof(unsigned long))
>
> +/* On some platforms relocations to global data cannot go into read-only
> + sections, so 'const' makes no sense and even causes compile failures
> + with some compilers. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ALPHA) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> +#define __ksym_const
> +#else
> +#define __ksym_const const
> +#endif
> +
> struct kernel_symbol
> {
> unsigned long value;
> @@ -192,7 +201,7 @@ void *__symbol_get_gpl(const char *symbo
> static const char __kstrtab_##sym[] \
> __attribute__((section("__ksymtab_strings"))) \
> = MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX #sym; \
> - static const struct kernel_symbol __ksymtab_##sym \
> + static __ksym_const struct kernel_symbol __ksymtab_##sym \
> __attribute_used__ \
> __attribute__((section("__ksymtab" sec), unused)) \
> = { (unsigned long)&sym, __kstrtab_##sym }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 13:08 section breakage on ppc64 (aka __devinitconst is broken by design) Al Viro
2008-02-03 17:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-03 18:02 ` Al Viro
2008-02-03 20:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-03 21:02 ` Al Viro
2008-02-04 0:27 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-02-07 18:33 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-02-07 18:54 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-02-08 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2008-02-08 8:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-08 9:17 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080207185409.GA21145@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox