From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: enforce a retry of __scsi_add_device if bus generation changed
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:54:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802081354.23299.jwilson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.b66856ee2df66cd4@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 04:09:47 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> fw-sbp2 is unable to reconnect while performing __scsi_add_device
> because there is only a single workqueue thread context available for
> both at the moment. This should be fixed eventually.
>
> Until then, take care that __scsi_add_device does not return success
> even though the SCSI high-level driver probing failed (sd READ_CAPACITY
> and friends) due to bus reset. The trick to do so is to use a different
> error indicator in the command completion as long as __scsi_add_device
> did not return.
>
> An actual failure of __scsi_add_device is easy to handle, but an
> incomplete execution of __scsi_add_device with an sdev returned would
> remain undetected and leave the SBP-2 target unusable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> ---
>
> Jarod, does this work like I assume and fixes your setup of two OXFW911
> based disks?
Well, it results in the dmesg spew saying "sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Result:
hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK" -- i.e.,
DID_NO_CONNECT instead of DID_BUS_BUSY, but other than that, no change in
behavior, sdc remains unusable just as before.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-08 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 22:00 [PATCH 0/9] firewire-sbp2: misc hotplug related patches Stefan Richter
2008-02-03 22:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] firewire: log GUID of new devices Stefan Richter
2008-02-04 8:14 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 16:53 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-03 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: add INQUIRY delay workaround Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 17:01 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-03 22:07 ` [PATCH 3/9] ieee1394: sbp2: " Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 17:03 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-03 22:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: wait for completion of fetch agent reset Stefan Richter
2008-02-04 8:11 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: log bus_id at management request failures Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 17:16 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-03 22:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: don't add scsi_device twice Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 17:19 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-11 19:42 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-12 8:55 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-03 22:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: logout and login after failed reconnect Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 17:32 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-03 22:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: sort includes Stefan Richter
2008-02-03 22:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: fix I/O errors during reconnect Stefan Richter
2008-02-11 18:09 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-11 20:21 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-12 5:07 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-12 8:01 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-16 15:37 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-16 15:51 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-04 15:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] firewire-sbp2: misc hotplug related patches John Stoffel
2008-02-04 17:48 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-04 18:51 ` John Stoffel
2008-02-06 5:17 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-06 18:27 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-06 21:09 ` [PATCH 11/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: enforce a retry of __scsi_add_device if bus generation changed Stefan Richter
2008-02-08 18:54 ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2008-02-08 19:58 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-08 21:33 ` [PATCH 11/9 update] " Stefan Richter
2008-02-10 18:36 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-02-16 15:01 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-06 21:07 ` [PATCH 10/9] firewire: fw-sbp2: preemptively block sdev Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802081354.23299.jwilson@redhat.com \
--to=jwilson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox