From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756771AbYBIIGi (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 03:06:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752710AbYBIIGb (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 03:06:31 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:36013 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752696AbYBIIGa (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 03:06:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:05:03 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] latency tracer Message-Id: <20080209000503.f4eb2f02.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080209073756.GA13141@elte.hu> References: <20080208214522.GA31101@elte.hu> <20080208232306.6e8a8162.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080209073756.GA13141@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:37:56 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:45:22 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > Linus, please pull the latency tracer tree from: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git > > > > > > Find the shortlog below. > > > > > > This is the latency tracer from -rt > > > > I've never seen any of this code before and googling several of the > > patch titles turns up this email and nothing else. > > there might be some confusion here. Google for "mcount tracing utility" > - there's 2270 hits. There's been 8 full series posted to lkml in the > past month: > > .. > > we renamed the concept to 'ftrace' during pre-merge cleanups, perhaps > that is what caused you to not recognize this? (mcount is a confusing > name and ties it to a gcc feature while there's nothing gcc specific > about this concept.) > Oh. That clang you heard was a penny dropping. I'd been kind of ignoring those patches assuming I had a couple more months.