From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
ThomasGleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: EFI runtime code mapping enhancement
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802141306.17642.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202953580.5026.39.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
> For EFI runtime service in virtual mode, using direct mapping is mainly
> for kexec, where EFI runtime memory area need to be mapped at same
> virtual address across kexec.
I see. I didn't consider this aspect.
> - Use direct mapping of kernel, clean NX bit from kernel page table
> temporarily before/after EFI calling. This needs not split 2M page into
> 4K pages, because the region changed is aligned with 2M. And, because
> the changing is temporary, a little larger region is not a big issue.
I would just do it permanently.
> Aligning
> EFI runtime code region with 1G seems not a good idea too. I think a
> better method is adding a non-split mode to c_p_a(), where the region
> changed is enlarged if necessary to avoid page allocation. This can be
> used to implement early_set_memory_xx(). The early_set_memory_xx()
> instead of duplicated c_p_a() variant can be used by EFI code.
I attempted something like this with my advisory vs required static
protections last week, but it was rejected.
But yes having such a mode would make sense agreed.
The easiest way (as in least amount of code) to implement it actually
is to just bypass set_memory_*() and just do the lookup_address() yourself
and clear NX and do a global TLB flush. For the special case of NX
that is fine because you don't need to worry about fixing up any aliases.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-14 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 9:22 [PATCH] x86: EFI runtime code mapping enhancement Huang, Ying
2008-02-13 11:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 1:46 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-14 12:06 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-02-15 2:10 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15 2:25 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802141306.17642.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox