Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: trivial sparse warning in sched.c

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>]

[Peter Zijlstra - Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:45:14PM +0100]
| 
| On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 00:27 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > [Peter Zijlstra - Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:11:29PM +0100]
| > | 
[...]
| > 
| > Hi Peter,
| > 
| > dont you find 'return (void)foo();' statement a bit strange (as it was in
| > original code)? ;) Am I wrong? /it's night here, so half a brain already
| > tuned off ;)/
| 
| void foo(void);
| 
| void bar(void)
| {
| 	return foo();
| }
| 
| Maybe I'm just weird an twisted, but no, I don't find it odd. In my mind
| its consistent with how all other return types function.
| 
| Not sure what the C std text says on the matter though.
| 
| 

well, i've an obscure feeling about that. From one side I do understand that
you're *absolutely right* but the second form of statement is more clear
methink. That is what I prefer personally. Anyway the form of writting
such a statement is taste of code author - so you choose ;)

		- Cyrill -